/sci/ - Science & Math

The way your head interprets reality is familiar, therefore you feel comforable.

that implies that there is such thing as an objective standard for what is pleasing and what is not pleasing outside the brain such that the brain strives to attain it, which is pretty damn absurd.

UNFALSIFIABLE

>>4198971
Your use of the english language is shit and you ask the wrong questions.

>Is the world outside of my brain just black and filled with invisible energy configurations?

You sound fucking retarded.

>Is there such thing as physical objects, color, texture, light?

It depends how you qualify "existance".

>Or are these things just created by the brain as a way to make life more pleasing to me?

Everything you ever know is created by your brain. All you get is "ouput from your brain". Does this output correspond to actual input from a "physical universe"? This is something you will never know.

any other retarded questions?

>>4198994
Right, but outside of any lifeform's perspective, what does the universe "look" like?

>>4198971
>Is the world outside of my brain just black and filled with invisible energy configurations

Implying the notion of "black" exists without your brain.

>>4199009
that pretty crazy to think about
the universe has "no color"

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

You guys know what I mean. Stop playing semantics.

>>4199004
"to look" is completely subjective but to entertain you and I, reality would "look" geometric, some sort of freaky self-referencing construct

>>4199004
>Right, but outside of any lifeform's perspective, what does the universe "look" like?

YOUR WHOLE NOTION IS SHIT. YOUR QUESTION IS MEANINGLESS.

There is no "actual universe", no "universal perspective". There is only "perspectives of the universe" from observers. If there are no observers, there are no perspectives.

>>4199012
The notion of color is a property of certain "objects" that exists only for certain systems and certain situations.

Color is not some fundamental property of the universe in any fucking sense.

>>4199025
But just because no one can ever know what the objective truth is, doesn't mean that the objective truth doesn't exist. There IS a truth, whether anyone knows about it or not. What is your guess as to what that truth is?

>>4199012
>that pretty crazy to think about

If you are a 10 year old girl maybe, or you have a mental disorder.

Close, the real world is actually fuchsia.

>>4199040
WHAT COLOR IS "NO COLOR "

I DONT CARE IF THERE IS AN OBSERVER

WHAT FUCKING COLOR IS IT OUTSIDE MY BODY?

IT HAS TO BE ONE

>>4199012
a visual aid to pair with
>>4199040

We feel like we "are" our whole bodies when, in fact, we are just a cluster of nerves encased in bone.

Also, we only see in 2D.

>>4199048
"Objective truth" is not the same thing as "physical objects".

You are not even arguing correctly, you sound fucking stupid. Yes, there may be some "universal truths", BUT THAT IS ALL YOU CAN SAY.

The "universal truths" (if they exist) need not have to have any correlation to "physical objects". To prove that universal truths exists (it has already been proven that either there are none or an near infinite amount), and to prove that the "physical universe" exists regardless of perspective ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS. You need a course is basic logic bro.

>>4199067
You're talking jibberish. Stop shitting up this thread.

>>4199057
There is no nerves or bone. Only energy in various frequencies.

>>4199053
>WHAT COLOR IS "NO COLOR "
>IT HAS TO BE ONE

Nope. Color comes from photons/photon interaction, that is all. Without photons the whole notion of color is meaningless.

How old are you?

>>4199075
>doesn't understand basic logic

>>4199075
>12 year old detected

Just because you aren't educated enough or smart enough to understand very very very basic shit, doesn't make it gibberish. It just makes you stupid and uneducated.

Reality isn't objective.

>>4199110
It is objective, but no one will ever know the objective truth.

>>4199110
But it is, as it happens, full of stars.