/sci/ - Science & Math

Not one of those nutty theories suggests anything that isn't easily explained away. It shouldn't be hard to conclude for yourself.

then you are dumb

9/11 was an inside job.

>>1851461
>>1851464
When I made this thread I was expecting this shit.

Fuck off you faggots and why not try and explain it to me instead of going "LULZ TIN FOIL HAT CONSPIRACY"

>>1851467
no faggot, first explain how you are not dumb

Neil Armstrong did 9/11

>>1851469
Man, I didn't know 12 year olds browsed /sci/.

Well I guess they gotta go somewhere when /b/ won't help them with their homework.

The cameras were chest mounted in the suits, thats why he doesn't have a camera to his face.

The flag moving is moving because motion was imparted to it by being moved and because there's no atmosphere and limited gravity that motion continued.

Foot prints are what's to be expected from fine dry dust. try it yourself in some dry flour.

anything else?

>>1851467
Explain WHAT? You haven't asked any targeted question. Way to be vague, bro.

Very simple. A number of US aerospace companies built Saturn V rockets which were then used by NASA to land men on the moon in a propaganda coup, then subsequently to do research.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket

Troll thread? I think so!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA

If we have the technology to have a probe place this on the moon, (this is the minimum amount of effort needed to pull this off), is it really such a jump to having a person do it? Consider also that we had airplanes with pressurized cabins since the 1930's, well before the moon landing.

Why are there always crosses on the photos taken by NASA ?

>>1851494
viewfinder

Holy shit. If there's one thing the American government fails at, it's keeping secrets. Clinton can't keep an affair private, but you think they can keep a fake moon landing under the rug?

Do you know how many people worked on this? And you think NONE of them have come clean?

Their main opponent in the space race was Russia. Notice how they lost and STILL didn't suspect it of being fake? Surely of all people, THEY would be the ones to come up with this theory.

Op, you are an idiot.

>>1851504
u mad

>>1851504

Pretty much this.

Also, watch the mythbuster episode on the moonlanding.

The footprints is because there is no wind on the moon, so the sand particles aren't shaped round, like on the earth, so the footprint won't collapse the way sand on the earth does.

xkcd sums this dilemma up nicely

I can't believe people are actually taking this thread seriously.

>>1851530

I for one am still not convinced by the "evidence" in this thread, everything said so far can be reproduced in a studio.

>>1851548

Just because it can be doesn't mean it was. Get a fucking clue.

>>1851557

Wow boy you sure did convince me! The moon landings were real, I see the light now! [/sarcasm]

>>1851548

You want evidence, asshole?

They put a mirror on the moon that we are AS WE SPEAK bouncing a very strong laser off of. It's how we measure exactly how far and how fast the moon is moving away from the Earth.

If man hadn't landed on the moon to leave that mirror there, how would we get that information?

>>1851563

this

also, did they create all of the moon rocks brought back in a studio too?

There's an American flag on the moon. I don't need any proof because we own the moon and there's nobody on Earth can stop us.

>>1851563

The moon reflector thing doesn't mean people landed on the moon, it means humans sent stuff there. The LRO pics of Apollo landing sites is much better proof.

Any proof at all can be denouced by the hoax believers by saying NASA is faking it, so there's no real point to having this discussion.

Apollo project is one of the most accurately documented projects in the history of mankind. There are more evidence of Moon landing than ancient Rome or fucking World Wars you faggot.