[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 8 KB, 513x225, perpetual boat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:20:57 2010 No.1141996 [Reply] [Original]

It would work.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:21:57 2010 No.1142011 Thats not perpetual energy, but it could work.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:22:57 2010 No.1142019 MIND = BLOWN

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:22:57 2010 No.1142022 yes, it would work. if you had a powerful enough battery. very inefficient though. nice pic btw. copypasta? haven't seen it before.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:23:57 2010 No.1142027 I see nothing wrong here.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:23:57 2010 No.1142029 >>1141996 lrn2enthropy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:24:57 2010 No.1142045 File: 25 KB, 276x276, idtst.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] no

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:24:57 2010 No.1142047 >>1142022 No I made it and this is the second time I've posted this. I posted it in another thread for perpetual pictures.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:25:57 2010 No.1142048 the h20 to h2 conversion has been puzzling science for years. electrolysis requires too much poewr input. some MIT guy made a biomimetic plant like catalyst (works from sunshine), not sure how thats goin. you better off trying to harness wave power

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:25:57 2010 No.1142049 >>1142022 Solar.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:27:57 2010 No.1142065 File: 13 KB, 513x225, perpetual boat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Hows this?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:27:57 2010 No.1142069 see, i don't even think of this type of thread as a troll thread anymore. Just as a fun way to think of how things could work. >>1142022 is right. it would be very inefficient.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:28:57 2010 No.1142074 >>1142065 they've got water-powered cars that supposedly work. a BOAT? bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:28:57 2010 No.1142080 It wouldnt be perpetual because you would be using water energy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:28:57 2010 No.1142075 >>1142065 lol'd I love these threads.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:28:57 2010 No.1142073 >>1142065 Oh, good idea. although how would you start it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:29:57 2010 No.1142087 File: 1.88 MB, 294x210, Fat_Dog_oh_you_gif.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1141996 What would you use to evaporate the water? This would have been made a long time ago, if it were that easy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:31:57 2010 No.1142108 /r/ing the perpetual pic where anons carry up buckets to power a water wheel that powers a rocket ship.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:33:57 2010 No.1142125 File: 25 KB, 500x1030, 1275879236478.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] delivered

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:42:57 2010 No.1142186 File: 216 KB, 600x2100, 1275879165249.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:43:57 2010 No.1142200 >>1142125 Thank you

>>	Colonel Coffee Mug !phJ7yIcs.Q Tue Jun 8 23:46:57 2010 No.1142220 >>1142186 I lol'd.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:49:57 2010 No.1142245 >>1142065 You are not going to get enough energy back to do that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 8 23:50:57 2010 No.1142252 >>1142186 SO MUCH BAD SCIENCE

>>	Anonymous Wed Jun 9 00:40:57 2010 No.1142523 By skipping the whole god damn process and feeding the electricity strait into an electric motor you'd get waaaay better efficiency.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jun 9 00:46:57 2010 No.1142559 >>1142252 BUT IT FEELS SO good man