/sci/ - Science & Math

not calling it enterprise

>>7653305
Is that... Picard? Hell yeah, I'll read his books.

>59 Ouchi has suffered a day during which the heart stood him 3 times the amount 49 minutes, doctors resuscitated him, of course. Once, in a fit of consciousness he shouted to them, 'I beg you kill me! I'm not a guinea pig! '.
He survived a total of 82 days.

How much longer before MIT makes most unis redundant?

>go to uni ranked 100 - 200 in world
>look at maths curriculum out of curiosity
>single variable + multi variable calc in year 1, diff. eqns. and linear algebra in year 2, plus optional intro. to statistics, electives for everything else
>all of those are online on MIT OCW, but with no doubt a more comprehensive syllabus
>MIT OCW has physics 1-3, biology 1, chem 1, CS 1, microeconomics 1

If you were doing maths you'd literally be better off staying home and doing MIT courses for the first 2 years.

Chuck in something like reading 8 books from the /lit/ starter kit per term (which would be more worthwhile than any arts elective known to man), a few good foreign language workbooks and that is looking pretty damn good.

Although if you were driven enough to do that then you're probably better off going to a uni much better than mine.

>>6165864
You mean 'aliens' (You missed a letter).
All that is highly irregular.
Furthermore, despite the fact we have not actually lived your life, we shall continue to insist it is the same for everyone.

Battlestar Galactica is just Oregon Trail on Hard Mode

>>5092619
>anti-scientism

>I'm not a misogynist, nor am I a misandrist.
>I am (...) a feminist
>I'm a guy

I'll just leave this here...

>Today is the 2nd day of the 2nd week of the 2nd month of the 2nd year of the 2nd decade of the 2nd millennium

>>4282992

>mfw not a single one of these science-related programs is freeware
It's like they're practically begging people to pirate it

>extraction of ephedrine from salt or mineral blocks

>alkaloid
>"from minerals"
>mfw

Sage for obvious drug manufacture.

>In the chapter on spectroscopy, the author noted a discrepancy in the data between the metal content of Population I stars and Population II stars.What was cited as the reason for this discrepancy?

Astronomers: If I didn't read the chapter, what would be a safe answer to this question?

>>3857461
>philosophy of the science.
>Hermeneutic Psychology
Does your philosophy instructor specialize in existentialist philosophers?

Why don't you guys consider biology a science? It looks pretty scientific to me. I don't get it.

>>3787984

We have a limited understanding of the universe and how it came into being. There must have been a cause for the universe to come into being. The creation of the universe does not have to be the only event, and the tiers of creation can be infinite. A universe was created by a higher universe, in an infinite loop by whatever means. At any tier in this loop, an intelligent creator can exist. This can be true because we exist as intelligent lifeforms, yet we are composed of atoms and energy which are not. This is similar to a computer being somewhat intelligent (pro grammer) but being composed of computer parts. Our universe could have been created by an entity which is intelligent by our definition. It could be a universe which is composed of particles which interact with eachother to form a "brain" via its own laws of physics. Similar to how magic is magical when it is not understood, any god ceases to be our definition of a god once it can be described. We appreciate life on earth due to the great difference to the rest of the known universe. God1 can contain a similar scenario within itself as well as a less interesting big bang resulting in us. The intricacy of life on earth does not have to be based on just our universe, but also to possibilities of God1, which may exceed our own. God1 must also have a cause, and this scenario is now a possibly infinite loop. God2 created God1 and God2 does not have to be more complex than God1. This is one dimension of the God complex. There may be infinite dimensions with infinite God tiers for each. IE: Multiverse is the idea of an infinite 3-space universe having unidentical siblings. That is a two-dimensional God complex since every infinite set of multiverses can have multiverses. Worship what you want, because God1 is an unknown. I simply hold an appreciation for unknowns.

>>3572518

What am I reading.

>>3514646
>"pleb"

What the fuck are you even talking about? "Pleb"? Shouldn't you be hanging out at some Starbucks somewhere?

>>3462901
>they

I see, this is just a clever nigger thread.

Sage.

>>3446140
Not even samefag, but he didn't even imply that. Fucking retard.

>>3430277

> Everything that's being worked on, researched, invented...The people in power, and the economists behind them, all influence WHAT needs to be done in this world.

Mon Visage Whence

>>3423357
Reading comprehension fail. He was talking about the biological differences in _brains_.

>liberal apologetics
The fuck? What are you even talking about? This is not political.