/sci/ - Science & Math

I still haven't worked through Alcubierre's paper but they say they major imperdiment to physical implementation is the need for a large reservoir of negative energy. Pic related, due to the complex phase normalization of the Modified Cosmological Model (MCM), and that the energy depends of the square of the field, Sigma- is a negative energy reservoir adjacent to spacetime. The negative energy is right there available at H where it would be needed for the Alcubierre drive.

For more about the MCM, check out my free book:
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

My research program is currently the single most productive program on Earth. I recently wrote a book regarding my hypertimecube findings.

>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

Here ya go though since you seem keen on my nuts: it's a book I wrote that says lots of what I know about physics. My research is in the fundamentals of physics. A lot of people will say that their research in the fundamentals of quantum field theory is research into the fundamentals of physics, and it kind of is, but as a matter of fact QFT is one of the most advanced aspects of physics.

However, the heat equation which you do not understand, is from classical mechanics, and that is the bare assed bottom of the fundamentals. Maybe go to Khan academy or something before you have a crack at my opus, modest as it is with regards to the most advanced (a.k.a. complicated) stuff.

>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>>9544508
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>hypertimecube

>>9533900
>>skeptics
>>actively research
>No.
this is correct

Pic related: The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>>9528449
>>9528866
Time cube uses three time fields for the past present and future. Thus three dimensions of time construct a cube. That was in the early days, now there are four time fields and the best thing to call it is one of:
>time tesseract
>time hypercube
>hypertime cube

Recent summary book wrote the whole thing up real nice
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model = http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598

Historical papers on viXra
>http://vixra.org/author/jonathan_w_tooker

THIS IS NOT A JOKE POST
***BANNED RESEARCH****

Nobody likes my book and says they like it with a plainly formatted English language statment
>if like=1
>then fprintf("Nice book Jonathan Tooker")
>else fprintf("le schizo viXra may mays)

The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>>9488351
>What if gravity is actually just acceleration in another dimension and in this other dimension we are really moving away from what we perceive to be the direction of the gravity

cool sentence

>>9455386
>>9455378
so is it going to let me upload pic related today or what?