/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7013678

>one guy literally purporting magic
>thinks this is an actual scientific discussion

>>6943654
Stop being a retard.

>>4777333
>computer, electrical, and mechanical engineering

Thinks he developed a "GUT".
I am pretty sure you are out of your league kid. I doubt you even know higher level physics.

>>4749768
I don't think you understand math or physics.

\thread

>>4715543
>2012

>not understanding the double slit experiment

>still talking about wave/particle duality

Sure is 1920's in here

>>4702001

>>4696293
>Has never heard of calculus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_mathematics_topics

>>4661829
>science just a belief system

A belief system that directly corresponds to reality is more then just a belief system, it is the closest think humanity will ever know to a "fact".

>>4643878
>wants to have imaginary friend

How fucking retarded are you? If you want an imaginary friend just become christian.

\thread

>>4620247

>>4595481

>>4527813
>implying that doesn't make python look good

>>4443690

>>4329405
>mathematically a dot expanding equally in all directions is a sphere

Nope. The problem is that you are assuming that a dot is just a small sphere to being with. That is not true. The dot could expand to a cylinder for example.

A sphere that is scaled to some very very small value will look like a dot. A cylinder scaled to some very very small value will look like a dot too. Both will be "dots". If you expand the dots back out, one will produce the sphere, and the other will produce the cylinder.

You cannot just assume that a dot expands to a sphere. Stop talking out of your ass son!

>>4215200
>implying there aren't more unemployed engineers then unemployed scientists

Dumb post like yours just prove /sci/'s point. Engineers are retarded dumbshits only concerned with money. LMFAO.

>>4199048
"Objective truth" is not the same thing as "physical objects".

You are not even arguing correctly, you sound fucking stupid. Yes, there may be some "universal truths", BUT THAT IS ALL YOU CAN SAY.

The "universal truths" (if they exist) need not have to have any correlation to "physical objects". To prove that universal truths exists (it has already been proven that either there are none or an near infinite amount), and to prove that the "physical universe" exists regardless of perspective ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS. You need a course is basic logic bro.

>>3669912
>intelligent Christian

>>3228715
There is no god.

\thread

>>3047804
>military academy

How dumb are you?

>>2853423
Yes, math is not science.
DURRRRRRRR

>>2812024
>what underage dumbshit acually believe

>>2737654
>>2736929
>Calls himself a "scientist" cause he is embarrased he is only an "engineer"

>>2687529

>>2586007
>Shroud of Turin

Some guy who lived around 1200-1300 died for me?
Why the fuck should I care?