/sci/ - Science & Math

Oh yes. This would work everytime

Oh yes. This would work everytime.

THIS IS NOW AN EK THREAD

>>11477780
[math] \mathbf{ \color{ red }{ \heartsuit } } [/math]

>>11268282
(Does anyone even remember her?)

>>10092336
I'm the one who solved it. I don't need credit though. I have plenty of self esteem.

>>9521770
lol

Pebble game problem
Input: Directed acyclic graph, vertex V, K pebbles
Allowed elementary steps (no order):
- we can put pebble on vertex X, if in this moment there are pebbles on all vertices from which edge to X exists
- we can take pebble from vertex and put later

Question:
Is there (exists) algorithm (sequence of steps) to put pebble on vertex V ? Prove that this problem is in PSPACE.

I know that this problem can be solved using QBF, but it seems to be complicated. Can someone help ? Thank you.

>>7957179
>being this mad
>implying implications
>greentexting

>>7957181
I don't think anyone worshipped that crazy thing

>>7956943
Can we use a picture of EK instead

is there any actual evidence that fields exist?

I throw my telescope in the air sometimes

POO POO WILLY BUM BUM!

>>7240763
And reveal my real world identity?

Now that that bitch Harriet is out of the way I don't have to deal with that shit anymore.

>>7240718
I have a phd in zoology

What's up, bitches?

PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU

>PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU

PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU
PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU

>PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU

PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU PENISU

Edison > Tesla, discuss

>>6761926
so you say this is a basic tenet of physics, but can you intuitively explain to me how this makes sense?? also when you say "visit" a physics course, what do you mean exactly? excuse my bad english

>>6761925
@.@ ??
anon-kun, if you have nothing to contribute please leave my thread!!!!!!!!

>>6761905
?????? please help me
>>6761909
Think about the disparity in temperatures we are dealing with. you are seriously gonna tell me that NONE of the mass would be destroyed? Or at least some of the energy would be destroyed??

>>6761902
double mass? surely some of the mass is destroyed????

>>6761888
Fireball has no mass? Cleary a ball of fire which exists in space must be burning something which has mass
>>6761887
dont u think that if the brain exists in physical space and is part of the non-super reality, and thus a regular part of the world, that reasoning would be able to discover these so called "physical"laws of heat?

>>6761879
Ok, thanks for reply, but the SAT's are a reasoning test no?
Thus, i can correctly _reason_ that complicated thought experiments will help my score? I can effectively raise my IQ by simply practicing??