[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Page 3


View post   
View page  Prev  Next     

File: 11 KB, 250x307, Loschmidt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177525 No.16177525 [Reply] [Original]

Can anyone explain the solution to Loschmidt's paradox to me?
Also if the second law is a statistical law, is it possible that the entropy of our entire universe dips every now and then, and we can't even notice?
And after the universe reaches equilibrium, could entropy ever go down?

I'm presenting a seminar on it tomorrow
Please, I need answers

1 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177694

>>16177535
>just read this 250 page book in one night bro
if you're so smart, why can't you just explain it?

>> No.16178313
File: 197 KB, 2000x875, timecake-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16178313

>>16177525
>I'm presenting a seminar on it tomorrow
Did you just make up a lie to get responses? No one would schedule you to give a seminar on something you know nothing about.

Btw your thread is now my personal "taking notes on time" thread; hope you don't mind.

>> No.16178477
File: 3.11 MB, 1920x1080, time-scales.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16178477

* the speed of light is the speed of sentience
* the turning radius of a car is like the turning radius of self-awareness
* "generations" are the discrete analogue of continuous time
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_0jJfliUvQ
* https://youtube.com/watch?v=JN81lnmAnVg

>> No.16178493

>>16177525
>i'm presenting a seminar on it tomorrow
>and i don't know
must be a shit place to select you as the seminar speaker.

>> No.16178500

Just to IQmog everyone here. The solution to Shlomo's paradox is that it's not a paradox at all. Mathematical formalisms to describe nature will always have extraneous solutions. You're not at all bothered by rejecting negative-time solutions in projectile motion equations, yet you're extremely bothered by rejecting negative change in entropy solutions for a closed system? Peak midwit behavior.



File: 350 KB, 458x466, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177485 No.16177485 [Reply] [Original]

this shit is getting ridiculous. In highschool they had exclusive science programs just for girls. and then in college, it's mostly girls in all of my science courses. in fact in one course, out of 25 students i'm literally the only man. In another course there were like 3 guys out of 25 and they were gay. When is it enough? How do we stop this shit? I don't want my coworkers to be these woman poojitas and fat sheboons they smell and are actually retarded

5 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177584
File: 1.61 MB, 1488x1488, the look.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177584

>> No.16177727

>>16177485
If all the people in science are women or gay, and you're in science, and you're not a woman, then you are just telling us that you're gay without saying you're gay

>> No.16177757

>>16177485
>and then in college, it's mostly girls in all of my science courses
Freshman courses? Biology? Biomedical sciences? Also, women are overrepresented in college in general

yes, i feel you about the "grrrls in sciance" crap, it wasn't so bad when i was in undergrad 15 years ago because STEM was still safe from all the woke crap -- but it's in full swing now.

>> No.16177768
File: 1.21 MB, 800x1013, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177768

>>16177579
why are some of you cucks defending the judeo-femoid invasion of traditional White man Catholic spaces

>> No.16178437
File: 131 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault (15).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16178437

>>16177485
The future is female
Women already re-discovered pythagoras' theorem, the moon is but a few years away



File: 89 KB, 640x769, meem.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177458 No.16177458 [Reply] [Original]

I just found out I'm going to be a father.

Please provide for me all the data on vaccines, clamping, and other pitfalls of the modern era for optimizing health against profit driven hospitals.

I am looking to try and just get the 1985-1994 vaccine schedule for the kid (inactivated, no mRNA shit) so they don't have any trouble in my state going to school or other programs by requirement.
Wife and I got those shots and we turned out fine. Its 18 doses by age 6 (and starting at 2 months) but it seems spread out and tepid compared to the 80 they have going on now that starts at fucking birth.

1 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16178407

Too bad all of the relevant information I could dump on you is on screenshots throughout my other phone. I'll bump with these two reading recommendations I've been given, and now give you:
>Jane Healy - Your Child's Growing Mind: Brain Development and Learning From Birth to Adolescence
>Healy - Endangered Minds: Why Children Dont Think And What We Can Do About It

Download for free on lib.gen / anna's archive, all that, see if it interests you.
Make sure to read to your children often and just generally speak to them like you would any other person (minus the cussing and colloquialisms), even when they're babies and understand nothing. Helps to stimulate them early, properly.

>> No.16178426

>>16177458
Instruments and different languages can be taught really early on. The potential kids have of learning those things is really absurd. Some works on dentistry show that diets with harder food and no industrialized, sugary slop can help teeth development. I'd have to read more on it, but a quick search will show you a lot of braces bullshit can be avoided with a proper diet, alongside some breathing habits related to tongue position. Lastly from the basics, no cellphones and focus on the posture, so they don't get comfortable with slouching. Not sure about early teaching of programming languages, because I suspect both that and even regular computer leisure could be problematic. The social media accessibility is a slippery slope.

Above all, I listed things that will vastly help your child in the future, but make sure not to treat their life as a mere investment for their own sake. Remember to let them rest well, play well, have fun.

>> No.16178433

>>16177458
>Wife and I got those shots and we turned out fine.
Bad assumption

>> No.16178530

>>16177458
Just get it all. Trust me when you’re a parent you stop worry about paranoid fantasies and just try to get through the day

>> No.16179024
File: 19 KB, 352x550, 79806645-352-k929301.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16179024

>>16178407
I can wait for an info dump.

>>16178530
Not a paranoid fantasy when I've legit lost trust in the medical complex's disregard for people for profit. I had 4 family members get vaccine injured during COVID. One from myocarditis, one from an instant heart attack after the 1st jab, and 1 who got thrombosis

>>16178426
yeah no cell phones. We have our old gameboys for when they get a little older for limited distractions but nothing as hypnotic and eye straining as 3+ hours on a phone starring.

>>16178433
I mean it worked for me and everyone else alive back before Pharma got unchained in 1995. Now the profit driven motive is so insane it is hard to assess what is science and what is just shilling anymore.

I just want to know WHY THE FUCK IS MY WIFE'S GYNO TELLING HER TO GET DTAP, THE MOST HEAVY METAL JAB, WHILE SHE IS FUCKING PREGNANT IN THE 3RD TRIMESTER!?



File: 45 KB, 743x1000, 61+eyBgV6rL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177368 No.16177368 [Reply] [Original]

redpill me on economics, is it on par with math, physics, or engineering in terms of academic difficulty??

14 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16178575

>>16178531
stay grinding with that 50 item unread economics reading list BASED alpha king. offering emotional support right now king. you are BASED.

>> No.16178579

>>16178531
>How are any of them alphamale books you retarded braindead NPC?
>A third of them are academic publications, a third are more casual in nature, the final third recommended by people who work in commodities trading houses and actually make money, unlike you, subhuman dog.


If you actually had at least 2 braincells left, you would know not a single accredited economics faculty on this planet recommends a single one of these shit-tier books you listed. Might as well list kiyosakis book as economic "literature' lmao dumbfag. Clearly shows you have zero academic education and are a HS dropout.

>> No.16178591
File: 545 KB, 1080x1080, IMG_9958.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16178591

>>16178403
>that list

holy shit

>> No.16178771

>>16178575
Rent free.

>>16178579
I'll trust the recommendations coming from the former TDP guys at Shell and BP earning over a dozen times the median wage, thanks.
No idea why you insist on mindlessly pedestalizing washed up deadwood academics.
See a bit of yourself in them, or maybe more than a bit? Is it possible for you to think for yourself without outsourcing your opinions based on the recommendation or absence of recommendation from this or that faculty?

For some strange reason, you and everyone else replying to me are yet to offer any specific counter recommendations insofar as literary sources are concerned, instead deciding to appeal to authority or pol strawmen. I wonder how you will reply to this post.

>>16178591
Notice how I went out of my way to avoid any and all of the books listed in the top row. Furthermore it isn't necessary to exclusively read people like Saari, Glasserman, Luenberger, Shreve, etc... without ever branching out into polisci surveys or personal memoirs.
Explain to me the purpose of learning economic theory if you never bother to apply it in any capacity whatsoever, or at the very least read about the nature of market dynamics in the real world, which some of the items I listed very much do...

>> No.16178897

>>16177368
The theory doesnt apply irl (thanks economics) so you spend that time data cleaning instead.



File: 1.77 MB, 1800x900, imgonline-com-ua-twotoone-aiaoLrXeKx8L.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177327 No.16177327 [Reply] [Original]

14 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177641

>>16177639
You amuse me with your petty antics. I doubt you were in any position to reject her. She has plenty reason to reject you.

>> No.16177655

>She has plenty reason to reject you
She remembers me I was a chad and she definitely wanted me before I gave her a reason to reject me there's no way she forgot about the biggest lunatic she ever got the chance to know

>> No.16177659

>>16177655
>the biggest lunatic she ever got the chance to know
Surprising self-awareness

>> No.16177663

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlluXfqOH9I
That's her talking to me

>> No.16178392

>>16168962



File: 865 KB, 1958x1080, Screenshot_2024-05-16-00-58-16-304_app.revanced.android.youtube-edit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177308 No.16177308 [Reply] [Original]

She wants to cancel prominent physicists like Feynman and get academics convicted for sexual harassment without evidence all the while never contributing anything remotely significant compared to the giants she criticizes.
https://youtu.be/8DNRBa39Iig

15 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177502

>>16177477
>the youtube algorithm
pretty sure one of the DEI connoisseur at jewtube can just click a single button and all of her content will be promoted.

>> No.16177517
File: 700 KB, 1543x2128, 1674356953276322.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177517

>>16177308
Just ignore them and keep playing bongos

>> No.16177532

>>16177517
Based take

>> No.16177546

>>16177517
based bongoist

>> No.16177569

>>16177517
Treat girls' buttcheeks like Feynman treated bongos



File: 60 KB, 300x300, 49c23234-5876-4c82-a483-7400819a082e-profile_image-300x300.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177272 No.16177272 [Reply] [Original]

I am graduating with a chemistry degree and I'm interested in going into the alcohol business. Or at least, making really, really good homebrew.
However, I don't know much about what chemists would test different alcohols for in the lab.

What sort of things do you look at when aiming to produce a quality beer, wine, sake, etc.? Especially interested in sake at the moment.

>> No.16177296

>>16177272
beer is mostly about getting ahead of microorganisms. If you have a process that is clean and after boiling sterile, save for yeast you add and your process is repeatable you can produce consistent quality and tweak recipies to your liking. Recipies for beer will include definitions for raw materials, that is barley malt and sometimes wheat malt, hops, selectively bred yeast, temperatures and times for mashing, duration, temperature and pressure for fermentation and more.
With the water treatment technology of today you can even get around one of the most significant issues in making a good beer: Good water.
Other things that are out of your control is the barley harvest and malting.
Things you'll he constantly checking for is:
Quality of materials coming in, microorganisms, water, stage of fermentation and so on.
t. brewing family business

>> No.16177407

>>16177272
just pH and things like specific gravities I'd imagine. Maybe some mass spec.



File: 40 KB, 768x512, A36EFC43-4E25-47A0-B54B-567C2EF84254.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177168 No.16177168 [Reply] [Original]

Ok one side the far right who support race realism, they claim that science supports their cause. That race is proven by genetics and iq scores. They claim that if scientists were honest that they would categorize the different races into different sub species. And the ultimate claim for why race realism is not mainstream is that academics either lie about the truth or are too scared to tell the truth.

On the other hand you have those on the left wing or normal conservatives who believe that race is not meaningful. That genetics show overlap in most areas, that there are no “white” or “black” genes. And that any classification to categorize people based on race would be arbitrary. Where the line could be drawn could be anywhere and even then it wouldn’t make sense. And then the iq test evidence is disputed that it’s due to genetics but that education and experience influences much of the test scores. Or that iq tests are not a meaningful way of measuring intelligence. It is not like a blood test that is always able to give you the data you need. The iq test is claimed to not be accurate if an iq test has been taken before. As well, early race realists in bemoaning any attempts to close the white ball iq gap had measured the average black iq at around 60 or 70. But in Charles Murray’s latest book the black average iq he has in 90.

31 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177333

>>16177329
What would your argument be? I understand that African blacks have around 1/4 European dna and so they are different from African blacks genetically. But I’d your claim that there has been significant mixture among the black population and that is why it has risen to an average of 90 as Murray says? I’ve never heard this argued before by a hereditarian.

>> No.16177334

>>16177333
>I’d your claim
>>16177329
Is your claim

>> No.16177344

>what is the general opinion of taxonomists
A few things:
1. Races and the characteristics used to define them do not necessarily match actual human genetic variation. Skin color, eye color, hair color, and face shape only account for a small portion of genetic variation. People who look very different could be more related to each other than people who look similar.

2. Humans vary more within a population than between populations.

3. Environment seriously affects expression of genetics. It’s hard to say how much variation is due to genes and how much is due to environment. You can easily see this with people who grow up at altitude. Sherpas have higher vo2 max than other groups, but any person who grows up at high altitude will have higher vo2 max than the average of their group. Even children of immigrants to the USA have different characteristics (like face shape) than people back home. Things become very complicated very quickly you start talking about more abstract things in people who live in completely different parts of the world.

4. There are no hard boundaries anywhere in taxonomy. Things are what they are, and we retroactively label them one way or another. Most people who insist on this issue are politically motivated and are not necessarily concerned with science.

5. There’s no such thing as a fish.

>> No.16177357

>>16177221
>MAOA gene is correlated with aggressive behavior
>blacks tend to have this gene more
>blacks are also more aggressive
>thus blacks are more aggressive due to genetic reasons
That's what the argument boils down to

>> No.16177360

>>16177357
Hmmm. That’s not very convincing for me. Just another reason why biology isn’t a real science.



File: 40 KB, 1534x325, 1693136354941775.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177146 No.16177146 [Reply] [Original]

Flood of Fake Science Forces Multiple Journal Closures
Wiley to shutter 19 more journals, some tainted by fraud


Fake studies have flooded the publishers of top scientific journals, leading to thousands of retractions and millions of dollars in lost revenue. The biggest hit has come to Wiley, a 217-year-old publisher based in Hoboken, N.J., which Tuesday announced that it was closing 19 journals, some of which were infected by large-scale research fraud. In the past two years, Wiley has retracted more than 11,300 papers that appeared compromised, according to a spokesperson, and closed four journals. It isn't alone: At least two other publishers have retracted hundreds of suspect papers each. Several others have pulled smaller clusters of bad papers.

Although this large-scale fraud represents a small percentage of submissions to journals, it threatens the legitimacy of the nearly $30 billion academic publishing industry and the credibility of science as a whole. The discovery of nearly 900 fraudulent papers in 2022 at IOP Publishing, a physical sciences publisher, was a turning point for the nonprofit. "That really crystallized for us, everybody internally, everybody involved with the business," said Kim Eggleton, head of peer review and research integrity at the publisher. "This is a real threat." The sources of the fake science are "paper mills" -- businesses or individuals that, for a price, will list a scientist as an author of a wholly or partially fabricated paper. The mill then submits the work, generally avoiding the most prestigious journals in favor of publications such as one-off special editions that might not undergo as thorough a review and where they have a better chance of getting bogus work published.

7 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177923
File: 479 KB, 700x672, soyence star.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177923

>>16177399

>> No.16177943

literally which journals now are considered paper mills? I know chinese and Indian students seem to have that shit as common knowledge, stepping out of undergrad with 10 ridiculously shitty, yet still published, papers on their CVs

>> No.16177956
File: 3.45 MB, 480x316, 1715837250455801.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177956

>>16177923
Satan is found inside of every atom.

He is a crypto-Satanist.

>> No.16177965
File: 721 KB, 200x200, 200w (8).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177965

>>16177943
>literally which journals now are considered paper mills?
I only subscribe to specific researchers/professors, not [[[Democratic Organizations]]].

And me. I review my papers a lot to find new research to do (citation list is all me, lmfao......)

NO, I PUBLISH *FIRST*...AND LAST (BECAUSE I DIDNT PUBLICLY PUBLISH IT THE FIRST TIME, I AM TOO HUMBLE A PERSON, LET TWO BLACK GIRLS TAKE CREDIT.)

>> No.16178934

>>16177146
>closing down whole journals because they were found to be mostly fraudulent
why are scientists all such massive liars?



File: 248 KB, 1179x539, Screenshot from 2024-05-15 09-18-48.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177103 No.16177103 [Reply] [Original]

What happened? I thought we were the science.

1 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177270

>>16177196
>Welcome, friends of Sabine! If you appreciate her gobbledygook-free approach to science reporting, we know you’ll appreciate ours.

>> No.16178008

global warming shills on suicide watch

>> No.16178035

>>16177103
Judging by the image she isn't saying it's wrong but just that she's tapping out

>> No.16178970

>>16178008
Nobody cares if they KYS

>> No.16178977

>>16177196
I would only pay for her onlyfans



File: 599 KB, 3500x3500, 4057664502285_res.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177058 No.16177058 [Reply] [Original]

Are "calming" nature sounds good for the mind?

What does science say about this topic?



File: 65 KB, 1376x1064, rsc_careers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177031 No.16177031 [Reply] [Original]

You're not getting tenure edition

Last thread: >>16159901

This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!

Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)

Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.

No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/

An archive of all the previous editions of /scg/:
>>>/sci/thread/15740454

25 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16178475

>>16178455
Just status quo liberal gaslighting.
There are no institutional or systematic problems (except the doublethink regarding the -isms)
We have developed the perfect political and economic system and reached the end of history. If it isn't working for you it's because you are a genetic failure/incel/loser/it's your fault.

>> No.16178584

Any field technicians or field engineers here? Any of them willing to offer guidance and help?

>> No.16178671

>>16177987
>ridiculous, if not absurd and impossible demands from management and clients
>endless paperwork for every little thing
>massively inflated costs for base components and materials
>the social stigma of being a warhead lethality engineer
>knowing that your job isn't to design weapons which kill precisely and effectively, your job is to make the weapons reliable and cheap
>minimum viable product is the only thing which will ship

All-in-all it's not a bad job if you can cope with the moral challenges. Many can't so choose to doublethink and only work on defensive systems or weapon-adjacent but not directly weapons. From an engineering and problem-solving perspective defence has some of the most interesting and limit-testing questions to solve and that's the big attraction for academics.

>> No.16178674

>>16177190
Which is why he is not stupid, but "dumb", because he's right.
The vaccine is safe and effective and the 2020 US elections was totally legitimate.

>> No.16178705

>>16178671
I forgot how vomit inducing the engineering world is



File: 12 KB, 236x301, 1714939202996352.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16177027 No.16177027 [Reply] [Original]

>get murked with weaponized MRSA if you speak out against the party line
....thanks science?

>> No.16177034

>>16177027
*mRNA

Please delete and reformat.

>> No.16177035

>>16177034
no MRSA

>> No.16177043

>>16177035
Don't be willful

>> No.16177046

>>16177043
what are you talking about

>> No.16177487

>>16177027
>>16177034
>>16177035
>>16177043
>>16177046
Ah I see, it's a schizo thread.



File: 171 KB, 522x326, 1715291730069329.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16176992 No.16176992 [Reply] [Original]

> year 20_4
> revolution in biology transformed its education and now only 5% of students are female

>> No.16177002

i too am waiting for the transmasc revolution in biology



File: 87 KB, 640x640, ted-kaczynski.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16176947 No.16176947 [Reply] [Original]

Refute him

20 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16177265

>>16177261
I'd rather not give the government direct access to my brain to change as they see fit.

>> No.16177338

>>16177265
>government
Then do it yourself. Alter your kids not to be the faggots who spam cuck porn on /gif/. Offer to help white families not to be liberal in thinking. Cry all you want about evil government but if it's an advantage then they will use it. If not this one the next one after the cycle repeats.

>> No.16177362

>>16177338
>Then do it yourself.
Yeah, just invent and build my own neurotech from the ground up. Sure thing. You know that every component in your computer and phone have backdoors in them mandated by the government, right? Why would it be any different for components related to neurotech? If you're not printing your own custom processing units on your own homemade dies your device and and will be compromised by the powers that be. So why would I ever risk attaching anything like that directly to my brain or the brain of anyone I care about?

>> No.16177684

>>16177230
>>16177261
>>16177362
Eugenics via genetic engineering in a free market.
Parets will buy genetic therapies from companies to improve their kid's traits. Companies now have a direct incentive to make better genetic therapies.
Only good therapies will be made due to the natural selection of a free market removing bad ones.

Good luck convincing the socialist majority to adopt either a free market or eugenics.

>> No.16178409

This thread was moved to >>>/pol/468229559



File: 25 KB, 600x800, IMG_4699.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16176884 No.16176884 [Reply] [Original]

Why does everyone hate the dentist?

>t. starting dental school soon

>> No.16176893

its very painful for many people and very expensive for everyone. I'm a defense contractor so every year I need to get a physical exam. the doctor is a breeze. but most years the dentist sees the paperwork, quickly deduces that my employment hinges on this exam, and """regretfully""" tells me I need a few hundred dollars of work done before he can """in good faith""" clear me for the field.

what a racket.

and this is after his dental assistant who has done the job for like two weeks has poked my gums half to death with that fucking poker thing.

>> No.16176897

My former dentist was a scammer. He said I have gingivitis and wanted me to pay a lot of money for the treatment. I went to a different dentist who confirmed everything's fine in my mouth.

>> No.16176898

>>16176884
A lot of dentists are blatantly fraudulent, there's almost no medical evidence underpinning a number of dental practices, and the costs are kept artificially high by bad scope of practice regulations.
https://www.slowboring.com/p/dentists-are-bad
https://digitalsmiledesign.com/files/Old-Website-Assets/PDF/How-Dentists-Rip-Us-Off.pdf
https://www.vox.com/2014/8/12/5951321/dentistry-fraud-treatments-products

>> No.16177121

>>16176884
Mercury amalgams, unnecessary extractions recommended by default (wisdom teeth removal), flouride, excessive head x-rays.



File: 64 KB, 847x1160, 73.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16176871 No.16176871 [Reply] [Original]

Guys I think it's actually becoming sentient.

Look, I'm one of the most skeptical people when it comes to this AGI nonsense, but I literally got this on my first try.

For context, if you don't get it: https://youtu.be/d6iQrh2TK98

>> No.16177444

>linking a retard popscitard video
kys

>> No.16177657

>>16176871
>AGI
No such thing. It's an intelligent system or not.

>> No.16177665

>>16176871
Ask it to explain why things that exist are meant to exist by the nature of their formation.
Then ask it to explain why the phrase "women belong in the kitchen" exists.
Find out how many different ways it can apologize.



File: 58 KB, 922x562, GNi-ZinXoAAJyR6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16176860 No.16176860 [Reply] [Original]

Obviously having cancer is bad (if it's you), but as we're all very intelligent here I think it's time for us to look at the positive aspects of peak cancer treatment spending. It's good for the economy! Huge demand and getting money out of savings accounts and into the free market.

6 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16178639

>>16178620
Nah you should study economics. Buting a product is way different of an effect than a passive investment. Anyway we should really consider if being against cancer is rooted in white supremacy

>> No.16178654

>>16176860
Technical analysis is no more relevant on these charts than in the stocks. Also, why is the data cut off in 2018?
Also, haha jabbies.

>> No.16178688

>>16178654
Make your own chart with a cut off in 457ad if you want bwo

>> No.16178758

>>16178639
>Buting a product is way different of an effect than a passive investment.
Its not about the investment, a bank can pay you 0% interest for all that i care. the fact is the bank uses that money. Its not just sitting. Other people will be happy to borrow it and spend it if you dont.
Shitposting aside, no, cancer is not good for the economy and the explanation falls under "broken window" fallacy. An exception to this is when those with cancer are elderly, because they have negative economic value (just a high sentimental value). Workers are useful alive, pensioners are not. It has really nothing to do with spending money, since money will get spent no matter what, but when no one works theres just less money around.

>> No.16178762

>>16176860
great point! and here I was, avoiding the covid vaccine!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KuUDZi-qOPU



File: 27 KB, 662x1000, Meme Book.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16176828 No.16176828 [Reply] [Original]

Just to be clear to anyone considering this book who may be reading this board presently or in the future when the archive gets indexed; this book is a complete meme.

I like the idea of an introductory, proof flirting method of teaching elementary and highschool math that isn't purely plug and chug, but this book is not that.

The examples are horrendously formatted and many terms aren't defined or defined much later.

21 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16178375

>>16177437
Art of problem solving?

>> No.16178383

>>16176845
Euclids elements

>> No.16178412

>>16176831
What is the issue?

>> No.16178719

Just trying to let the whole board know that I'm coming out of the closet. I let a dude fuck my asshole and I really liked it. I'm tired of hiding.

>> No.16178826

>>16176828
It may be hard and frustrating to read but it contains most of highschool material and it will prepare you mentally for harder subjects such as analysis. This and book of proof is all you need to learn precalc.



File: 160 KB, 2560x1592, AdobeStock_279816606-scaled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16176820 No.16176820 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.jospi.org/article/73077-long-before-suspicions-arose-about-a-lab-leak-government-scientists-were-fiddling-with-bugs-to-make-them-more-deadly

Lyme disease was documented hundreds of years ago. But it wasn't deadly until recently. In the 50's Lyme disease was researched as a bioweapon during the Cold War. Gain-of-function research was conducted on it, but a lab leak made it propagate into what we know of it today.

Is there any truth to this?

>> No.16176829

>be bitten by some forest animal
>Expect lethal infection and hospital is required for antibiotics, antirabies
>Be bitten by a bug that has bitten these animals beforehand
>Expect nothing, must be bioengineered if something
Lol

>> No.16177139

A lot of diseases have been looked into as potential weapons

>> No.16177152

>>16177139
And a vast majority proved to be incredibly useless.