[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   
View page  Next     

File: 246 KB, 714x922, gr1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103138 No.16103138 [Reply] [Original]

>Rigorous science demands support of transgender scientists

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(24)00187-9



File: 316 KB, 2121x1414, lab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103136 No.16103136 [Reply] [Original]

It is widely known that animal baby meat tastes better than its adult counterpart.
That got me thinking.
Would it be possible to emulate that "fresh out of the oven" flavor using lab meat?
If so, how would it be achieved?

>> No.16103143

>>16103136
No, because it's not part of a living animal. Meat is so much more than just a series of protein cells.



File: 128 KB, 1600x900, gettyimages-645604187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103129 No.16103129 [Reply] [Original]

Why are microplastics bad, exactly? Isn't the body supposed to shit out external agents? If I eat a lego piece I will shit it out in 24 hours but somehow if I cut it in tiny pieces it will get stuck in my organism? How?

>> No.16103150
File: 198 KB, 1024x1366, file.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103150

Is microplastic good for you?

>> No.16103164

>>16103129
If you swallow a condom full of coke you shit it out but if you just swallow the coke you die, I wonder why



File: 102 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103102 No.16103102 [Reply] [Original]

Why was quantum computing a flop?

>> No.16103116

It couldn't run Doom.

>> No.16103141
File: 33 KB, 700x467, images.wsj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103141

>>16103102
It was taken over by career academics, pr management and government agents. It's a big money blackhole. No one is working on an actual quantum computer. They don't even know what they are doing.

>B b but quantums are real ... You are a quantum denier!
I repeat: No one is working on an actual quantum computer.

>B b but why would they spend so much money on a scam?
Yeah, like big scams didn't exist in our history before.

>B b but microsoft has a qc. You can access it online.
What you can access online is a really expensive random number generator.

>B b but research takes time and money.
Yeah its been 30 years now and hundreds of billions of dollars and still nothing. How do you tell if its a really long research or just a scam to steal taxpayer money and hype up share prices?

>> No.16103144
File: 3.03 MB, 438x854, 1711714974272.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103144

>> No.16103158
File: 84 KB, 600x600, P304-600--600x600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103158

>>16103144
They show these steampunk chandeliers since 10 years now. Can we compare the different chandeliers and point out how they are better than the previous ones?

>> No.16103161

>>16103144
>even the diversity hires have to do some work
impressive



File: 58 KB, 855x714, 43563456345.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103098 No.16103098 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.16103105
File: 113 KB, 604x811, Januray 2022.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103105

ChatGPT is literally retarded.

>> No.16103115

>>16103098
>Be concise!
Glad to see I'm not the only one fed up with it's bloat text

>> No.16103133

>>16103115
I created a GPT template with instructions and I had to write multiple different instructions about shortness to it just to make it shut the fuck up. So now I don't have to add "be concise" to every question and it's answers are much more digestible.

>> No.16103156

>>16103098
you already posted this on /biz/

>> No.16103162

>>16103156
And you didn't answer!



File: 390 KB, 1476x1476, 1711693721600814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103070 No.16103070 [Reply] [Original]

Just learned about the number 37.
Oh boy.

2 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16103079

>>16103070
That's nothing. Your jaw will drop at 38.

>> No.16103117

>>16103070
wait till you hear about 137!

>> No.16103125

>>16103070
Have fun with the number 73

>> No.16103146
File: 255 KB, 500x330, TIMESAND___Jesus.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103146

>> No.16103157

>>16103077
Parasite is the reverse of white when you type it. White parasite. And it rhymes. Coincidence?



File: 41 KB, 640x725, 11204899_1021105801254964_272384979069603596_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103061 No.16103061 [Reply] [Original]

I am not against vaccines in general, but after covid I started to question a lot things going on in the "scientific community".

>> No.16103068

>>16103061
truth:
vaccines, like any other medical procedure, should be personally evaluated by you one a risk-to-benefit basis with a bayesian view of its safety profile and your personal risk.
basically: "are you afraid enough of losing a limb to trust the jew with his 'insurance'?"

>> No.16103081
File: 3.09 MB, 498x280, a.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103081

d-delet this

>> No.16103086

>>16103081
Why?

>> No.16103093

Those are infections diseases that were reduced with a combination of improved hygiene, pest control of disease carriers, antibiotics, and vaccines. Also, the vaccine for typhoid fever does not provide long-lasting immunity (requiring repeat or booster doses) and is not approved for children younger than 2 years old, and that is public information.
Vaccine effectiveness is determined by randomized controlled trials, not charts like this.

>> No.16103095

>>16103093
>Vaccine effectiveness is determined by randomized controlled trials, not charts like this.
But as we know they regularly cheat with the trials and skew the data. So how could we trust them?



File: 453 KB, 955x1519, Screenshot_20240329-041119_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103030 No.16103030 [Reply] [Original]

Who here has used pic related. What was your experience with it?



File: 321 KB, 608x784, 1711702677701.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103015 No.16103015 [Reply] [Original]

Physics bros? What is a "4d phantom"?

>> No.16103017

>>16102796

>> No.16103039

>>16103015
Fancy name for something meaningless

>> No.16103085

>>16103039
>Fancy name for something meaningless
That's 99% of quantum physics in the last 50 years. Modern scientists are scams. It's cargo cult nonsense.

>> No.16103172

>>16103015
Wasn't this supposed to recreate the big bang? What's the hold up?

>> No.16103178

>>16103172
thats the lie they told to justify creating it



File: 27 KB, 557x551, frogposters win again.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102813 No.16102813 [Reply] [Original]

its your time to shine, janny



File: 88 KB, 680x604, 4d-ghost.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102796 No.16102796 [Reply] [Original]

kek, CERN scientists are really running out of ideas to not admit they have spent 70 years, billions of dollars, and tens of thousands of aggregate IQ points to produce absolutely nothing

https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-capture-elusive-4d-ghost-in-cern-particle-accelerator
>Physicists Capture Elusive 4D 'Ghost' in CERN Particle Accelerator
>There's a specter haunting the tunnels of a particle accelerator at CERN.
>In the Super Proton Synchrotron, physicists have finally measured and quantified an invisible structure that can divert the course of the particles therein, and create problems for particle research.
>It's described as taking place in phase space, which can represent one or more states of a moving system. Since four states are required to represent the structure, the researchers view it as four-dimensional.
>This structure is the result of a phenomenon known as resonance, and being able to quantify and measure it takes us a step closer to solving a problem universal to magnetic particle accelerators.
>"With these resonances, what happens is that particles don't follow exactly the path we want and then fly away and get lost," says physicist Giuliano Franchetti of GSI in Germany. "This causes beam degradation and makes it difficult to reach the required beam parameters."

6 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16103065
File: 18 KB, 640x591, 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103065

>>16102796
>mugh prootoon computah from the muvis is reel

>> No.16103066

>>16102796
>scientists never say anything about ghosts
blame the dipshit journo who couldn't understand anything being said so just jumped immediately to the supernatural

>> No.16103075

>>16102796
Resonance Cascade?

>> No.16103078
File: 56 KB, 639x372, 1711546032636914.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103078

Wow! It makes my particle hard. How monumental is this, scibros? Should we start burning all physics books, or just selected chapters?

>> No.16103084

DEFUND COLLIDERS

completely fruitless boondoggles.



File: 1.76 MB, 850x1531, karyl-princess-connect-v0-5z792fgyvxea1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102795 No.16102795 [Reply] [Original]

Me and a friend were talking about cute little catgirls uwu. And we started talking about the science of mixing human dna with cat dna to make catgirls. what would be the logical science here. What do you think if someone out there actually tried experimenting with this concept. Hopefully the world will be filled by cute little catgirls walking the streets one day.

>> No.16102860

Either this is a consequence of your mind temporarily being numbed by your likely recent (or ongoing) masturbation session, or you were born this way and there is no way to save you.

>> No.16103059

>>16102795
Gene editing I guess



File: 21 KB, 1080x866, MIT-logo-red-textandimage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102794 No.16102794 [Reply] [Original]

Let's assume a hypothetical scenario

>You have disposable income
>You can build a University with whatever resources or infrastructure that you like
>However you want it to be among the top 10 Universities of the world

What factors would you need to consider to reach that level? What would you want to invest the most in?

13 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16103050

>>16102984
Ratings for the past decade have been an absolute meme and don’t mean anything

>> No.16103056

>>16102962
you don't get to live in your idealized perfect fantasy world, it makes no difference how frustrated you get or how outsized your sense of entitlement is. heaven is where you go after you die, here on earth you have to deal with the reality of living in an imperfect world.

>> No.16103062

>>16103056
>heaven is where you go after you die
nice link retard

>> No.16103080

>>16103056
the premise of the thread is literally how you would make a better university given enough resources retard

>> No.16103082

>>16102938
>>limited to at most one PhD student at a time
>>they should not consistently publish more than 4 papers per year unless it is abundantly clear the quality is excellent
these are unironically good changes along with raising pay
add slashing admin almost to 0 and this would be ideal imo



File: 147 KB, 800x1199, carbon nightmare.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102790 No.16102790 [Reply] [Original]

whats the carbon footprint of a starship launch?
should starship be made illegal to save the planet from global warming?

9 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16103010

>>16103002
The purpose of Starship is to launch massive military satellite constellations into LEO.

>> No.16103064

>>16102790
Elon of all people should be making electric rockets

>> No.16103072

>>16103002
>it will require multiple launches

Good thing it'll be reusable

>> No.16103074

>>16102790
low quality bait

>> No.16103096

>>16103072
Hopefully its launch pad will be.



File: 147 KB, 1199x924, lääkeapustaja29.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102781 No.16102781 [Reply] [Original]

late night data collection edition

Previous: >>16087005

We discuss research, DO NOT offer advice (just fucking go see your doctor), make fun of premeds and shitpost.
Keep vaccination/clamping/vitamin K/soliciting advice out of this thread and start your own because it takes a lot of space.

>> No.16102786

Medically speaking, how often is too often as far as jerking off?

>> No.16102845

researching a dr for umbilical hernia repair.
laproscopic seems like a bad idea, because you're just putting more holes in the peritoneum. those are more failure points for potential hernias later on, no? compared to just one incision that a mesh is put over.

i'm in my late 20s, and i powerlift.i've been calling different surgeons and getting differing advice.

>> No.16102982

>>16102845
sounds like you're doing a good job being an informed patient anon. i can't imagine that port holes from lap procedure significantly increases risk of hernia but you do you i'm not a surgeon



File: 163 KB, 1280x602, Homo sapiens.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102771 No.16102771 [Reply] [Original]

Plenty of people, especially on this website, do not understand that a scientific hypothesis has to be effectively proven in order to be elevated to the level of theory. A scientific theory is NOT a guess. Evolution is a fact.

>> No.16102803

>>16102771
no it isn't

>> No.16102810

Science doesn't prove things, it disproves them. If a theory has not been disproven, then it is assumed to be true by inference.

>> No.16102816

>>16102810
Notice I said "effectively proven," not "proven". That is only possible in mathematics.

>> No.16102818

>>16102771
This is an old image. No mention of denisova, likely an early entry of people related to Melinesians aborigines and papuans into the new world long before ANEs, pretty sure type R reentered east Africa from outside. Also genetic exchange with Neanderthal and denisova was more transformative than 5% admixture would suggest. Lots of new stuff coming Into view.

>> No.16102826

darwin's evolution conjecture is not a scientific theory because it cannot be disproved.



File: 169 KB, 736x1102, IMG_8413.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102768 No.16102768 [Reply] [Original]

A 10 year long, multi-trillion mega project to supercharge the advancement of AI would bring us a 100 years into the future by the end of it.

2 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16102774

>>16102770
I won't give up on this high thought!

Consider the growth in our economy that coincided with the growth in our technologies.
And so, the multi trillion spent would be dwarfed by the returns; a Jetsons-like explosion of possibilities

>> No.16102776

>>16102768
God what would i do to suck that guy on his prime this world is soo cruel

>> No.16102777

>>16102774
There will never be another Manhattan project. AI is a meme, literally just matrix multiplication.

>> No.16102785

>>16102772
It's a long story, but basically a Stanford vision experiment in 2012 led the the explosion in modern AI.
Well, imagine if there was a program dedicated to computer science experiments that'd mimic as many aspects of the human body as we can.

Consider the tidal wave of side innovation that'd come from that

>> No.16102791

>>16102777
AI is an amalgamation of contemporary computer science breakthroughs.
But yes, one can basically replace 'AI' with 'modern computers' in any given article about it.

In any case, a massive project like this would matter-of-factly bring us innovation that'd be as breathtaking as the internet's creation.



File: 467 KB, 1000x706, Mountaing_lake.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102756 No.16102756[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I've heard that, in the Benelux, students who publish 4 innovative, cohesive and relevant peer-reviewed papers can apply for a PhD title.
Does anyone know if it's possible to apply for a "PhD by publications" from overseas? I'm Brazilian and, here, you're expected to first get a Master's to then get a PhD. These processes together take a minimum of 8 years, and you're expected to live on a minimum wage while you're doing it.
Has anyone here gotten a PhD by publications? How was your experience? I'm looking forward to read from any others interested or engaged in amateur research.

>> No.16102760

>>15833839
>Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.

>If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.

>> No.16102766
File: 41 KB, 614x582, 1709250385736-0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102766

>>16102760
NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST HECKIN PUT THE PENIS IN THE VAGINA. THAT'S NOT WHERE IT GOES



File: 161 KB, 800x789, I love science.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102726 No.16102726 [Reply] [Original]

why are sciencels like this?

>eat bugs
>vaccine
>own nothing
>be happy

>> No.16102769

the meme that science is for smart people means that science attracts loads and loads of dumb people with narcissistic delusions of intellectual grandiosity.
statistically, dumb people are far more common than smart people and since delusions of grandiosity are common in over 10% of the population, which is a far larger total number of people than the genuinely smart percentage of the population, science ends up being filled with mostly idiots. the few smart people notice this and quickly find something else to do and the end result is science being nearly 100% morons.

>> No.16102828

>multiple bait threads remain up for hours
Why are jannies such worthless piles of shit?

>> No.16102975

>>16102828
Triggered sѹentist

>> No.16102993

>>16102726
You have created an image in your head of a person that does not actually exist.

>> No.16102996

High IQ societies are high trust



File: 72 KB, 800x768, bugbeque.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102709 No.16102709[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I FUCKING LOVE EATING BUGS

2 replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.16102715
File: 7 KB, 644x700, 38126 - SoyBooru.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102715

eatings bugs is good
wearings masks is good
fauci is good
living in pods is good
being happy is good
owning nothing is good
science is good

>> No.16102717

>>16102711
CAUSE THEY HECKING LOVE THE BUGS DUUDE

>> No.16102720

>>16102714
0/10 NOT ENOUGH ONIONS

>> No.16102724

bump

>> No.16102970
File: 160 KB, 960x864, science-vs-soyence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16102970

>>16102715
no
no
yes
no
yes
no
see picrel