[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 57 KB, 976x850, 1711873859614670.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23265732 No.23265732 [Reply] [Original]

I'm convinced that anything woman touch in art, whether it be literature, music, cinema, painting, photography, and etc., turns to shit.
is there any papers supporting this?

>> No.23265774

Women are only for breeding children and taking care of a home. They're not supposed to touch the arts.

>> No.23265785

>>23265732
another shit frogposter thread

>> No.23265790

>>23265732
Many female artists disprove your theory by counter example.

>> No.23265798

>>23265732
Yea desu, its not as if theres no great female examples, its that in the ages where only men were allowed to do those things, a lot of shitty things were made by men too, yet it didnt turn to shit.
Only when women entered the market, it turned to shit. Centuries of vast swathes of male shit is not enough to destroy an artform, it takes just a few decades of female shit.

>> No.23265802

>>23265798
honestly, this

>> No.23265817

>>23265732
>is there any papers supporting this?
Observable facts that are uncomfortable don't get studied a lot anon. You won't find anything exploring why lesbians abuse their spouses so much more than other pairings.

>> No.23265965

Women seem a lot more likely to produce something that's just bland, and consensus approved, because they're so much less combative as a gender.
Even feminism, effectively just waits until people in power tell them they're allowed to think those thoughts.
There wouldn't be women working, unless companies had a desire for a larger workforce. It's obvious, isn't it?

>>23265798
Well there you go. That word. "Allowed". Who has to give them permission? Why couldn't they have written things on their own, and shared them amongst themselves? Men literally had to kick the doors wide open and say "please come in".

>> No.23266027

>>23265732
Yes there is..but only virgins can read it

>> No.23266040

>>23265732
>is there any papers supporting this?
Learn English.

>> No.23266049

>>23265798
Basically this. Women as a group/category turn anything to shit, but the individual woman by virtue of being an individual may rise above the level of shit, as seen in the occasional female example.

>> No.23266089

>>23265732
>woman touch in art

Which woman anon?

>> No.23266152

>>23266089
Imagine correcting someone's grammar and inserting a commaless vocative in the same sentence

>> No.23266250

Where in the art did the woman touch you?

>> No.23266266

>>23265732
American Psycho is a kino movie, so I don't think so, buddy.