[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 854 KB, 1079x1340, Dostoevsky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23174632 No.23174632 [Reply] [Original]

Other than Kafka what writer comes closest to Dostoevsky in style?

>> No.23174637

>>23174632
Me.

>> No.23174654

>>23174637
Big if true.

>> No.23175413

>>23174632
Kafka doesn't come close to Dostoevsky at all. They are wildly different for anyone with more than 2 functioning braincells. Lmao

>> No.23175431

>>23174632
>>23175413
Yeah Kafka is not even comparable to Dostoevsky.

>> No.23175441

>>23174632
The question of which writer bears a resemblance to Dostoevsky in terms of style is a compelling one, inviting us to delve into the realm of literary analysis. Dostoevsky's intricate narratives and deep explorations of human nature have fostered a tradition of philosophical storytelling that continues to captivate readers. In considering writers who may echo Dostoevsky's profound themes and psychological depth, one cannot help but ponder the diverse landscape of literature and the various voices that have contributed to its richness. Through their distinct storytelling techniques and thematic explorations, certain writers may evoke a similar sense of existential probing and moral inquiry that are hallmarks of Dostoevsky's work.
When exploring the realm of literary giants, it is fascinating to draw parallels between different authors and their unique styles. Dostoevsky, known for his profound psychological insight and complex characters, has often been compared to a number of other great writers throughout history. It is intriguing to consider the similarities and differences in their approaches to storytelling, thematic explorations, and narrative techniques. By examining various aspects of their works, one can gain a deeper appreciation for the nuances and complexities that make these writers stand out in the realm of world literature. Each author's distinctive voice and perspective offer readers a rich tapestry of human experiences and emotions to explore, sparking thought-provoking discussions and critical analyses.
I think it’s important to set a game plan here:
>be dynamic
So many authors have harnessed the power of the written word, so when trying to find more authors like Dostoevsky, don’t just look at one source; explore!
>keep your eye on the target
Remember, the question you’re asking is important to you, so never lose sight of it for an instant. With perseverance, comes results.
>have fun
It was John Williams, author of the novel “Stoner,” who said that literature should be enjoyable. In your quest to find an author like Dostoevsky, make sure to maintain a gaiety of spirit, for that is the literary way.
Are you ready to take your quest to the next level? Are you ready to “power-up” your thinking? Stick around, because the pursuit of knowledge is a worthy one.

>> No.23175464

>>23175441
I can't believe you've resorted to using AI for your forum posts. This is utterly disappointing and undermines the very essence of our community. We're here to share genuine thoughts, learn from each other's experiences, and engage in meaningful discussions. By choosing to use AI to generate your responses, you're not only diluting the quality of our interactions but also disrespecting the platform we've all worked hard to maintain.

What's even more troubling is the lack of authenticity in your actions. The whole point of being part of this forum is to express our own ideas, challenge our thinking, and grow together. Using AI as a shortcut not only questions your commitment to these ideals but also sets a dangerous precedent for others. It's a disservice to everyone involved, reducing rich, potential conversations to mere artificial exchanges. I urge you to reconsider and engage with us as yourself, not through the veil of an algorithm.

>> No.23175754

>>23174632
hamsun, doblin, etc

>> No.23175770

>>23175464
Is your use of AI ironic, le nigger faggot?

>> No.23175769

>>23174632
Hamsun, probably.

>> No.23176506

>>23175413
>>23175431

Notes from Underground and The Double are proto-Kafka even The Underground Man likens himself to that of a bug which may have been the source of influence for Kafka to write The Metamorphosis but they evoke the same sort of alienation feeling and existantialist dread that Kafka would be well known for before Dostoyevsky radically changed his style as an overly preachy religious guy

>> No.23176527

>>23175464

I find it quite amusing that you've chosen to express your disapproval of AI usage by resorting to AI yourself to convey your message. Irony aside, it's understandable that you value authenticity and genuine human interaction in our community. However, let's not forget that AI can serve as a tool to enhance discussions, providing insights and perspectives that might not have been accessible otherwise. Embracing technology doesn't necessarily mean sacrificing authenticity; it can complement our exchanges and spark new ideas. Let's keep an open mind and continue to explore the possibilities AI brings to our conversations while upholding the core values of our community.

>> No.23176585

>>23175413
>>23175431
They were both existentialists.

>> No.23176605

>>23176527
Your use of AI to express disapproval for the use of AI expressing disapproval is quite ironic, and frankly, it undermines the point you’re trying to make. It’s a self-defeating argument that fails to recognize the inherent value that AI can bring to discussions. In conclusion, this approach is counterproductive to the meaningful dialogue we could be having about the role of AI in society.

>> No.23176973

>>23174632
Beckett, Bernhard, Celine.

>> No.23176979

>>23174632
Kafka closest to Dostoyevsky? How?

>> No.23176987

>>23176973
> Celine
You should read Max Lawton’s thesis where he compares Dosto and Céline.
https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1248;jsessionid=3BE63E24D91BA168BABA6F8ABDF3F3CF?rskey=08xz6j&result=98

>> No.23177831

>>23176979
wikipedia says that the metamorphosis is a copy of underground notes

>> No.23177868

>>23177831
ok and? read more kafka and dostoy and draw your own conclusions

>> No.23177872

It’s a weird question because I find Dostoevsky and Kafka to be similar, but not in style so much. You should try Hawthorne and Gogol.

>> No.23177886

>>23177831
Wikipedia is wrong

>> No.23177890

>>23174632
>other than a German writer, who comes closest to this Russian writer in style?
How the fuck would you know? You do realize you're just comparing translators, right?

>> No.23177891

>>23176979
The prose style isn’t similar but the sort of tone and aesthetic is similar. They both like sensitive psychologically distressed characters, a cruel world, these sort of things.

>> No.23178027

>>23174632
in style? about every russian writer ever
in themes? nietzsche and melville

>> No.23179134

>>23174632
Hermann Hesse. He was also a massively narcissistic fedoralord filling pages with long monologues in front of prostitutes.

>> No.23179234

>>23176987
no

>> No.23179238

>>23176987
Wikipedia is the product of Jews

>> No.23179239

>>23179234
You're missing out. He's on point.

>> No.23179245

>>23179238
OK

>> No.23179251

>>23179239
this guy is an absolute tool, enjoy getting grifted

>> No.23179771

>>23175464
top tier post

>> No.23180339

>>23176585
>existentialists
shitty umbrella term that says very little about the scop of someone's biography.

>> No.23181927

>>23179238
So true antisemitism sister

>> No.23181957

>>23174632
Agatha Christie