/lit/ - Literature

Yukio Mishima - armpits

>>23043231
Any writers with a giantess fetish or is that really a product of the 21st?

>>23043239
Not sure but maybe Rabelais was into macro

I get the sense George Bernard Shaw may have been into tickling based on this and other scenes in his works

James Joyce and his predilection for farts needs no introduction

>>23043242
>Not sure but maybe Rabelais was into macro
kek

cars and airplanes

>>23043231
There's a fine like between being a footfaggot and Foot Enjoyer.
What is the footfag?
>Crushing
>Stinky
>Drool
>His attraction comes from the forbidden, the perverted, the disgusting. He perverts the Feet and their natural beauty with unnatural lust. He wishes for those "unsullied feet" as Homer says, to be made as filthy as his own soul. And through all of this, he pays little heed to his lover. His love is "of the body merely" -- "and base." (Soc. Sym. Xenophon)
And the Foot Enjoyer?
>Tender
>Clean
>Flowers
>His attraction stems from a longing for deeper intimacy, from love of the woman as a whole, head and foot. He elevates the foot into a place of prestige and honor with his hands and tenderly kisses the soles, he does not pervert it with lust, but appreciates its beauty. His love is of the soul "and of immortality." (Diot. Sym. Plato)

They are not the same.

Robert Graves — femdom, I'm pretty sure. (Try The White Goddess.)

He also thought women's hair was magical. (But of course it is, so that doesn't count as a fetish.)

>>23043459
Yeah I think we are on a similar wavelength. For me what is attractive about the human foot is precisely its gracefulness. The point for me is that it’s beautiful, not dirty or anything. When footfags post porn pics where a woman is shoving her foot into the camera lens it turns me off totally.
I’m not sure about you, and I don’t want to shame you for this if this is the case for you, but personally I have never been aroused by the idea of being “dominated” by feet or “submitting myself” to them, as some people seem to be, nor by anything that invokes feelings of abjection. If anything my feelings run in the opposite direction. I like the sight of a barefoot person because it’s charming and vulnerable. Feet are very tender and delicate and sensitive to stimulation. I literally knew someone IRL who could be overstimulated to the point of passing out just by gently swishing a feather over their soles of their feet.

>>23043583
>I’m not sure about you, and I don’t want to shame you for this if this is the case for you, but personally I have never been aroused by the idea of being “dominated” by feet or “submitting myself” to them
Treating feet as a thing to "submit to" would be perverted as well.

Dostoevsky liked feet.

>>23043632
Yes I need to screencap his letters where he talks about kissing a girl's toes and women's diaries talking about him fondling their feet and post them.