/biz/ - Business & Finance

AI thread

>Is it true it will never make another sats ath?
They have been lying to you, we're hitting around 0.004 sats this bull run, don't let the evil side tell you otherwise they just want to spread misery, gl anon!

>>57562575
It's very unlikely yeah, even eth never was able to match its sats blow off top and it's been years now

>>57562575
Who cares? it doesn't mean you'll underperform btc if you buy link now, even if link doesn't do a new sats ath again. Only retards who did not sell for btc at the top are worried about this

>>57562575
Yeah. Its achieved shitcoin status. I'd buy something else if I were you, like ICP.

>>57562575
Nobody cares about sats

>>57562748
kek, nice cope

>>57562631
>>57562640
>>57562739
look they are here OP, do not believe their lies

>>57562824
What cope? Nobody cares about sats

Linkies
>Chainlink should be in the top 3

Also linkies
>no one cares about sats

So which is it? Do you compare against others or not? Pretty stupid buying anything if it won't do better than at least btc really

>>57562881
>Linkies
>>Chainlink should be in the top 3
>Also linkies
>>no one cares about sats
>So which is it?

There's zero contradiction in this you retard.

THE Cuckolds of crypto

Link need an x4 in sats to make a new ATH vs BTC.
Considering Link did an x2 in sats since the bottom in 2023; it's certainly a possiblity that we get a new sats ATH in 2024/25

>>57562575
did links go back to 20 yet

>>57564881
>did links go back to 20 yet
20 what? you need to be more specific Ranjesh

>>57562631
That’s because eth is not needed

>>57562881
It literally can be both are you fucking retarded?