/sci/ - Science & Math

Right now I think the only observational evidence regarding this theory has to do with dark flow, where many galaxy clusters are all moving in the same direction and some astrophysicists think this has to do with the tug of another universe

quantum mechanics and multiverses = religion

so far only 1 universe has been observed. Anything else is just speculation.

>quantum mechanics = religion
wat. the most accurate model we have is a religion?

>>4399826
Which multiverse theory?

>>4399864
>>4399826

Quantum mechanics is proven science. We have observed, and documented that shit extensively.

Multi-verse bullshit isn't quantum mechanics.

\THREAD

>>4399882

The cat is alive or dead. You will NEVER see a cat dead and alive at the same. It's utterly bullshit from a big fat green elephant anus.

>>4399898
ONE! you cant see it becasue there is to much interference
TWO! we have already made a human hair size object vibrate and not vibrate at the same time, and seen it do so
THREE! its works to produce answered correct with only 0.0000000000001% error

>>4399898
>implying Quantum mechanics ever mentions the cat is "dead and alive"
>implying you aren't just talking out of your ass and misinterpreting shit

No physicist or quantum mechanics textbook ever written says the cat is "dead and alive". You are talking out your ass, and misunderstanding a simple thought experiment.

Religion says 'A' a long time ago before there was any science age.

When it comes to science age, science discovers 'A'. Does that mean science does not depends on religion? or that science is pure ignorant.

>>4399898
>implying anyone ever said that

>>4399898
>can't understand a simple thought experiment
>thinks it implies "the cat is dead and alive"

You are the reason why america is going to shit.

>>4399931

Perfect.

>>4399941
>>4399929
>>4399922
>>4399915

You can't prove me wrong and attack me. As expected.

Schrödinger and Einstein = wrong
/SCI/ = right

Ok, then.

>>4399965
babbys first troll

>>4399965
>give prove
>You can't prove me wrong and attack me.
why take things so personal? just becasue someone gives proof against your idea doesn't mean its an attack.

I have increased my probability estimate that many-worlds is true after David Deutsch lectures, who argues that we have empirical evidence about other Everett branches, equivalent to fossil findings of dinosaurs.

He makes the point that no one would question the existence of dinosaurs in earth's past based on the classification as an "interpretation" of dinosaur fossils. We treat them as empirical evidence that there indeed are dinosaurs in earth's past (in this timeline).

I don't have the expertise to review all such claims, but I take it far more seriously now. It is entirely possible that many-worlds is the natural state of our existence.

>>4399988
Samefag here. To clarify, I think he used quantum computation as a kind of empirical evidence of other universes. If you search for David Deutsch on youtube, you find some of his talks about it.

>no one would question the existence of dinosaurs in earth's past based on the classification as an "interpretation" of dinosaur fossils.
have you been to the USA?

>>4399997
Creationists don't question dinosaurs, do they? They just place it in a hilariously wrong time frame.