[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 655 KB, 320x320, 1703651463010.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15942561 No.15942561 [Reply] [Original]

How do they compare?

>> No.15942568

For me, it's the "Shut up and calculate" interpretation

>> No.15942574
File: 96 KB, 630x630, SEELE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15942574

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKtwcHD3TEQ

>> No.15942643

they are essentially interchangable and more important for philosophy than science

>> No.15942662

>interpretation
How is this any different from a failed experimental design?

>> No.15942682

for me its the Schlomostein-BBCberg interpretation

>> No.15942710

>>15942561
all mainstream interpretations are cope

>> No.15942715

>>15942710
which ones are not, then?

>> No.15942723

>>15942561
>>15942568
Particles are not real.

>> No.15942724

>>15942723
so basically the MWI? or whats the concrete difference

>> No.15942740

>>15942561
Interpretations I suppose

>> No.15942747

>>15942724
Einstein was wrong, there are no electrons, and anything derived from them, which is pretty much everything related to particle physics.

>> No.15942793

>>15942561
For me it's: nobody truly knows, so we're all fcked and I can basically make up my own interpretations, but that only leads to depression and existential crisis, so I just don't care.

>> No.15942953

The wave function never collapses

>> No.15942957

>>15942561
Just think like every particle is a fluctuations in a field, thats the Best way to imagine them

>> No.15943110

>>15942561
superdeterminism is correct.

>akchually it's not an interpretation
fuck off.

>> No.15943126

>>15943110
if true, then all of us can just give up because it quite literally doesn't matter

>> No.15943165
File: 66 KB, 740x710, 1682914403546369.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15943165

>>15942561
Many-worlds is the only actual metaphysical interpretation and one that unites /sci/ and /x/.
COPEnhagen "shut up and calculate" "interpretation" is for autists that want to bury their head in sand and do math without been called a schizo.

>> No.15943220
File: 4 KB, 505x572, nobrain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15943220

>>15942662
>>15943110

>> No.15943221
File: 8 KB, 250x250, glowie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15943221

>>15942747

>> No.15944222

>>15942561
None of them are in conflict with actual results. The only differences are philosophical and as of now untestable

>> No.15944631

Only consciousness collapses the wave function.

>> No.15944747

All hidden variable theories are garbage.
QB is psuedoscience on par with MW or quantum mysticism in terms of making up garbage.
Bohm's has been experimentally debooonked.
Copenhagen is useful for teaching undergrads about the history of the subject, particularly if one wishes to make famous scientists look like retards. Unfortunately, it is difficult to draw the line between the original Copenhagen interpretation and its modern usage, but as it makes the fewest bullshit unfalsifiable leaps in logic, the modern Copenhagen is the only interpretation worth using.

>> No.15944773

>>15942561
relative state is the only interpretation. the others are fanciful copes.

>> No.15944808

>>15942561
Everything is superdetermined and happens simultaneously in parallel universes. Rick and Morty scientifically disproved all the other interpretations.

>> No.15945324

>>15942643
>philosophy than science

Two sides of the same coin.

Philo sophia = Love of knowledge

Science used to be called "natural philosophy" back in the day too

>> No.15945330
File: 141 KB, 613x671, 1703465145561162.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15945330

>>15944808
>parallel universes

If by that you mean "ether" then you are correct

>>15944747
>Bohm's has been experimentally debooonked

The fuck are you talking about troonoid

Just the other day they got more energy out than they put in at the national ignition lab, which is objective proof of an implicate order containing infinite amounts of potential energy

>> No.15945460
File: 239 KB, 750x600, 1698800357636243.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15945460

>>15945330
>Just the other day
>got more energy out than they put in at the national ignition lab
Link.

>> No.15945541

>>15944747
>All hidden variable theories are garbage.
proof?

>> No.15945556

>>15945330
>they got more energy out than they put in at the national ignition lab,
not really faggot. they got more energy than they put into the chamber itself, but when everything added up, like the whole energy for the whole fucking building (with all involved gear in that process) they got basically nothing out. moron