/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15600047
kill yourself

>>15600047
literally who

>>15600047
they are all safe in israel

>>15600047
Buy an ad next time, Linda

>>15602090
Diversity hire who got promoted after murdering seven astronauts.

>>15602456
they all are safe in israel, she did good

reminds me of picrel desu

imagine being a nasa astronaut knowing that a woman causes the deadliest and most recent spaceflight disaster in nasa history without suffering any repercussions and since then nasa has become majority female and that every last woman at nasa now knows without a doubt that they can make whatever mistakes they feel like no matter how catastrophic and there will be no negative consequences for them

>>15604214
>The important part is not correct decisions, but using violence against the decider if we don't like the decisions
Humanity is SO *clap* BEAUTIFUL *clap*

Holy fuck this thread

>>15604338
Would you do any better? I guarantee you're stunlocked when you look at a girl, no matter that she's 45 IQ points below you.

A few astronauts ans spacecraft sacrificed to human female worship is getting off easy. Species go extinct from this stuff.

Haha bump this mf thread

>>15604632
>stunlocked
just fucking end it my guy.

>>15602504
only true /sfg/ pros will understand this reference

>>15600047
>How did she get away with it?
>she
answered your own question

>>15604338
Its a good thing that NASA no longer has a human spaceflight program

>>15608659
Letting Musk take over all their spaceflight operations so they could concentrate on shilling trannys and global warming was a smart move by NASA

>>15602113
You're confusing the Columbia and the Challenger

>>15600047
Her bosses didn't want to admit that their affirmative action hire had caused such trouble because that would've made them look bad too, so she suffered no consequences

What's up with her nose.

>>15604404
no one said anything about violence anon
you can't fire a computer.
you can't make it feel bad and learn from its mistakes.

>>15602456
She got demoted not promoted

>>15615205
Using inferior solutions because you want to "enforce accountability" (but definitely not violently teehee) is quite violent to the e.g. astronauts you kill.

>>15615212
>NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe took the opportunity to praise Ham publicly, saying that the reassignment was "no reflection, in my judgment, on the competence or diligence or commitment or professionalism of anybody...." According to The Washington Post, "O'Keefe said she is so talented there is going to be a 'bidding war' for her among NASA facilities".
She killed seven people and NASA showered her with praise for it. Her next two positions at NASA were both senior administrative roles, higher on the org chart, though with less public exposure. For an attention whore, yes, it was a demotion since she was no longer on TV or the subject of "Girls in STEM" magazine articles. By any other metric, she killed over half a dozen people and got promoted.

>>15615248
Machines can still kill people, you retard. We should violently enforce laws against robot idolatry.

>>15604404
What's wrong with using violence? Whosoever sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed.

>>15608659
And yet they keep graduating classes of astronauts.

>>15615290
Guess which two are the pilots

>>15600047
Mariam Crystal Mommy!

Reminder they didn't even change their names lol

>>15615411
>onizuka
he doesn't look anything like his anime character
>ellison
>claude
there has never been a jap with those names

>>15617306
Claude Maki

>>15602456
Female moment?

>>15617374
fake and gay

>>15615411
Thats Challenger, Ham destroyed Columbia

post your yfw face when you find out ham was the one that killed voyager 2 by accident

>>15622777
>enjoying your feminism, american satanists?

>>15600047
Affirmative action hires can do no wrong because that makes the whole system look retarded

>>15600153
no u

>>15615411
Challenger was intentionally destroyed in 1986 because the next launch was scheduled to be HST, but NASA didn't have the software ready to operate HST. Instead of admitting that they couldn't put the software together in time, they bought themselves a 4 year delay by detonating Challenger. Once the software was completed, shuttle flight resumed, HST was the first launch after the delay.

New York Times, April 9, 1990
https://web.archive.org/web/20150525194741/http://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/09/us/telescope-is-set-to-peer-at-space-and-time.html?pagewanted=2

>When the project was officially begun in 1977, the goal was to loft the telescope by 1983. Technical problems, particularly with the optical systems and the guidance and pointing mechanisms, set the launching back to 1986. Then came the Challenger shuttle disaster in January 1986, killing seven astronauts, and the Hubble telescope and everything else were grounded indefinitely.

>But as it turns out, project managers acknowledge, ground controllers would not have been ready in 1986. The computer software for pointing the telescope and other complex operations was found inadequate and had to be completely revised, a task only recently completed.

So HST's launch was (((conveniently))) delayed by the Challenger explosion in 1986 and shuttle missions were then delayed until after the HST ground control software could be cobbled together, all without causing any public embarrassment for the NASA failures who couldn't get the HST software put together on time like they had initially claimed they could.

>>15604338
why do ugly people love astronomy so much?

>>15617306
Asians taking western names for when living in the west or dealing with westerners is an extraordinarily common thing.

>>15631915

>>15600047
The incident was effectively blamed on "toxic masculinity"

>>15615411
>brother of robert mcnair