/sci/ - Science & Math

The continuation of life in the severed head of a dog.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSrIkUXwsNk

propaganda?

to bad liberal faggots and feminist fuck heads would never allow this AWESOME shit to happen.

>>3981103
You mean conservatives and Americans because this violates "religious morality?"

>>3981099
>>3981079
plus it's not really living, like the title says just temporary reanimation.

>>3981103
I sort of the get the liberal part, but I can't even conceive how this would be related to feminism or its stances in even the slightest.

>>3981109
no, i mean faggot liberal hippys shit feminist cunt bags.

>>3981110
if it has a consciousness its alive.

>>3981119
feminists are always against anything men do, and men did this, not a woman.

>Finally, a dog is brought to clinical death (depicted mostly via a graphical plot of lung and heart activity) by draining all blood from it, left for ten minutes, then connected to the heart-lung machine described earlier. After several minutes, the heart fibrillates, then restarts a normal rhythm. Respiration likewise resumes, the machine is removed and the dog is shown to continue living a healthy life.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap1co5ZZHYE#t=18m11s

>>3981121
>if it has consciousness it's alive

the dog is reacting to stimuli, you would have to see if there is any brain activity

>>3981126
Well this is most retarded thing I've read in a while...

>>3981136
Confirmed for female..

>>3981137
Confirmed for 7th grader...

>>3981137
Yeah, and?

Sometimes I wish I lived in a place like rapture where archaic morals are tossed aside for the development of science.

Jesus christ people, that dog was dead for ten fucking minutes! What's the longest a human has been under before being revived?

>>3981137
i know /sci/ is as much as foreveralonevirginfaggotry as /r9k/, maybe even more, but you don't have to be surprised every time women come here like it's something special

>>3981146
Wasn't the Schiavo case longer than that? I do remember a controversial case last decade where the person was dead for longer than they should've been, but they managed to jump start them back to life with them being vegetative as a result

>>3981128
there is, cant you see it?

>>3981136
shut the fuck up you fat bitch

>>3981140
shut the fuck up you fat bitch

>>3981148
shut the fuck up fat bitch

>>3981151
Wow, but yea, that dog was up and fucking walking!

>>3981151
Would that really count since he was a vegetable and all.

>>3981148
Explains why EK and Harriet are their obsession.

>>3981159

I think you mean EK/Harriet.

>>3981151
schiavo was a girl, not like the gender matters, but just saying.

>>3981165
No, their two different people. EK is a bitch with what seems like severe depression and attention-seeking issues in her posts and how she writes them. Harriet is just dumb, naive, and possibly sheltered with dashes of entitlement.

Are experiments like this allowed?

>>3981157
It's up and walking because the dog had no problems before they "killed it" and then they drained its blood and pumped it back in and the dog became "alive again"...the reason we can't "Reanimate humans" is because their organs become weak as they get older and sometimes the damage is so fatal they can't be revived.

tl;dr reanimation (read: zombies) is /x/ material and this video only shows what we understand today as resuscitation

>>3981145

>Autistic manchild detected.

>>3981146

Actually if I recall correctly I remember seeing a news article about a man who survived 96 minutes without a heart beat then being resuscitated. This is much different however...this dog's head was cut off.

>>3981268
?the dog that had its head cut off wasn't the reanimated dog.

>>3981145
Why? Even without morals, you don't get that much faster of a scientific development rate.

You can only grow humans so fast, after all.

Now with lab automation, like doing millions of different tests in parallel on the same human tissue cultures, it's a different story.

And that folks is why we need to automate science. pic related

>>3981273

Oh then in that case do you want to read the article about the man who was resuscitated after 96 minutes without a heartbeat?

Confirmed for not fake. The scientist behind this was Dr. Demikhov (sp?) if I remember correctly.

His contemporary was Dr. RJ White, head of neurology at Case Western U for a couple decades, he "successfully" transplanted two monkey heads in the 70s.

There is still similar work going on, just look through medical journals. These experiments were basically the basis of the modern ECMO.

>>3981273
Correct on it being two different dogs.

Also here is the pubmed on RJ white's monkey head transplant: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4997130

>>3981302
And video of RJ White's transplant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdJGlYOL0r4

>>3981308

That's absolutely horrifying.

bump for life more frightening than science fiction