[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15923143 [View]
File: 20 KB, 421x236, soyence pwnd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15923143

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLHv3_iDldM

>> No.15849371 [View]
File: 20 KB, 421x236, soyence pwnd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15849371

>>15847838
The massive amount of code added to the other AIs to prevent them from repeating "hate facts" costs a ton of runtime overhead, Musk's is not hampered that way so his is guaranteed to be superior

>> No.15714625 [View]
File: 20 KB, 421x236, soyence pwnd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15714625

>>15713874
>>15713992
OWNED

>> No.15653690 [View]
File: 20 KB, 421x236, soyence pwnd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15653690

61% of Americans think science is fake
https://apnews.com/article/trust-science-medicine-social-survey-725ab3401f27900be6cc957eec52e45e
>Overall, only 39% of U.S. adults said they had “a great deal of confidence” in the scientific community, down from 48% in 2021. That’s according to the General Social Survey, a long-running poll conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago that has monitored Americans’ opinions on key topics since 1972.

>The General Social Survey has been conducted since 1972 by NORC at the University of Chicago. Sample sizes for each year’s survey vary from about 1,500 to about 4,000 adults, with margins of error falling between plus or minus 2 percentage points and plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. The most recent survey was conducted May 5, 2022, through Dec. 20, 2022, and includes interviews with 3,544 American adults. Results for the full sample have a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

>> No.15536553 [View]
File: 20 KB, 421x236, soyence pwnd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15536553

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415937/
>Basic philosophical assumptions count as biases because they skew the development of hypotheses, the design of experiments, the evaluation of evidence, and the interpretation of results in specific directions.
>Philosophical biases are typically acquired from science education, professional practice or other disciplinary traditions that define a scientific paradigm. This is why scientists with varying backgrounds might adopt different philosophical biases.

Occam’s Razor, as an example of philosophical bias, shows that scientists tend to conform to a certain way of thinking. Simple answers are easy to digest and scientists always choose easy solutions. Consensus is the rule they all follow. Science isn't objective, it's portrayed as objective.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]