/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16046615
>egotists saying "don't bother science already understands everything"

>>15636873

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Cube

A horse and a military commander walk into a bar. The bartender says, "If you solve RH then you get tenure anywhere you want."

Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237

>>12106783
Anyways, you can see how the twin surfaces are the past and future aleph- and Omega-branes. My idea was that if you can set up some kind of propagation if the H-brane, you would always have to have twin prime-numbered aleph- and Omega-branes because any other kind of brane would interfere with the "harmonic phase" of the branes whose levels of aleph were even divisors.

>twin surfaces

>>11902833
If a quantum particle moves in the universe, it should dynamically deform the local spacetime. Even if it's a massless photon, it has energy. GR says space curves in response to local mass-energy. The reason how we know gravity is quantum is that quanta and quantum fields have mass-energy.

I think your question was maybe about the graviton. I agree that the graviton is a hypothetical force carrying particle but Einstein showed that gravity is not a force so there absolutely no good reason to think a graviton exists unless your grant depends on you thinking it does. I think the reason we still haven't seen the graviton is because gravitons don't exist. This makes perfect sense actually when you think of gravity as geometry rather than a classical force like EM or Newton gravity.

For me, I don't want to go back. Forward only.

>>11440480
>was he actually into something big but we just ignored him?
You thinking that he got ignored does not do justice to the lengths they went to to try to steal it from him. In the long run, everyone in the time travel bureau hated them stealing it, and so they used the time cube time machine to sabotage the efforts of them who would steal time cube.

>>11263609

>>11176623
>He will definitely be a better ruler
Yeah, you are right about that!

>>11088005
>My point is if every object is 11D instead of 3D as they appear then every object is actually thousands of times more complex than we can measure?
Furthermore, most of these 11D are abstract phase dimensions needed to accomodate the degrees of freedom of the different isospin and hypercharge configurations, but four of these dimensions are just regular geometry. It's Lorentzian geometry rather than Euclidean, but that fourth Lorentzian dimension is classically geometrical while string theory counts the unconstrained positions in an irreducible tensor representation to come up with eleven total dimensions. One of the best thing about the MCM is that, contrary to string theory, it does does assign classical (non-Euclidean) geometry to all 11D.

Please have a look at these papers:
>Quantum Structure http://www.vixra.org/abs/1302.0037
>Geometric Cosmology http://www.vixra.org/abs/1301.0032