/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15505246
>It's just as I said

You cited sources that are too stupid to understand what light is. That's why they're still perplexed by the question to this day. Some even ask the same question, which makes your disingenuous statement to:
>"hurr go read a quantum mechanic book"
moot.

It's like Mormon telling me to read the book of Mormonism because I'm too "stupid" to understand his deep, but still radically insane ideas on the fundamental nature of how reality functions. I know you don't have proof of a light particle, just as I know that a Mormon doesn't have proof of the Angel Moron(i). Neither have proof of these alleged phantasms they believe in. One of them is dumb enough to apply the scientific method to such shadow chasing.
I am not going to waste my precious short time on this earth reading whatever insane gibberish that justifies, reifies and more or less acts like a coping talisman to believe in what never had basis in reality in the first place. Pony up or shut up you book learned moron.

>>15174066
And?

>>14760400
>trust the experts
Trust them or not, in either case dowsing rods demonstrably work.