/sci/ - Science & Math

Whenever I hear of this idea I feel the need to point out some things.

For one, I find it very interesting that people try to explain physics or physical effect in terms of the properties of computers or computer programs as we know them. This suggests in a way, that our world has some "defects" as compared to the outer universe of the builder of the simulation, while at the same time we assume their world to be similar enough that we are able to compare our vision of what a computer does with theirs.

These second thing I think is interesting about that is these explaination of physical effects are formulated in a way, which suggest that the (outer) universe is in reallity much simpler or classically, and quantum effects are just our problem - they are not as much laws of physics than errors of the computer or the simulation.

>>4438403
I remember hearing about (the first thesis) of that paper. I think these considerations are quite interesting actually. Don't know it they lead somewhere, though.

>>4383769
>saging the name field

btw. I wouldn't consider this too low level for SE. Although I'd formulate the question more general and ask for say the electroweak sector mass terms specifically in the end

>>4090076
ah, you're the person against people with red hair?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K7q20VzwVs&feature=channel_video_title

Rocket science.

>>3961967
You can't take algebra and topology at the same time. One is about linear vector spaces and one is about open and/or closed sets and sets of sets and so on. These are two rival philosophies, hence the axioms contradict each other.

>>3956043
>>3956130
B_{1/2}(a) = a

here's your 20 degree function, but well...

500.242 - 61233.8 x + 179562. x^2 - 218274. x^3 + 147990. x^4 -
63242. x^5 + 18155.6 x^6 - 3623.96 x^7 + 510.135 x^8 - 50.3063 x^9 +
3.33438 x^10 - 0.128776 x^11 + 0.000912453 x^12 + 0.000173841 x^13 -
7.52846*10^-6 x^14 - 2.47591*10^-8 x^15 + 1.18199*10^-8 x^16 -
4.10956*10^-10 x^17 + 5.62661*10^-12 x^18 - 8.93562*10^-15 x^19 -
3.50806*10^-16 x^20

learning for money.

I honestly hope you guys don't do this.

http://projects.csail.mit.edu/chanthropology/4chan.pdf

>>3691876
>In noninterial reference frames it is possible for objects to travel at any fucking speed.
Interdasting.

>>3691903
>g(u,u)=1
>somebody who actually had lectures on GR
>sign(+,-,-,-)
>2011

>>3691698
>implying light exist

my superiour semantics can solve all your problems.

wat?
bitmaps over lossy every time.

How can you believe in them, if they are just a theory (a theory (a theory (a theory (a theory (...)))))