/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16186039
>accusing all researchers in the oncologic field to be dishonest and have poor methodology
Yes.

>More than 9 in 10 healthcare interventions are not supported by high-quality evidence; harms are under-reported.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35447356/
Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Howick et al
1,567 eligible interventions, 87 (5.6%) had high-quality evidence supporting their benefits. Harms were measured for 577 (36.8%) interventions. There was statistically significant evidence for harm in 127 (8.1%) of these.

>ignorance

I requested evidence on the efficacy to produce a significant positive change in CLINICAL outcome.
It apparently is "ignorance" to point out that "the hypothetical mechanism of immunity" does not remotly reflect reality, otherwise their shit would work.

The esotheric meme of "immune therpeutics" is acutally ignorance, because as I mentioned because they simply do not care about clinical outcome.
It is equally as dumb as coffee enemas or drinking piss, while thats probably less toxic.
It's high tech esotherics, and yes, of course, their BELIEF in this lets them to double and tripple down, on "mystery of immunity" , when running in contradictions or failures of fullfilling their hypthesis" while not even considering, that they are don quixote fighting windmills.

It's dogmatic and esotheric. The only difference between the Biochem Alchemists and the meme Healing crystal folks is: Funding by Royal Fraternity and big Oil Conglomerates and PR.

>>16184445
self-reported higher rates. i suspect you don't even know what it is you're trying to argue, let alone rebut. you need a lobotomy

>>16184269
>The point made in this survey is not that mem who identify as 'feminist' suffer higher rates of ED, the point is that they are significantly more likely to use those drugs.
see
>>16184392
the rates of erection difficulties are self reported, just like use of EDM. yet the authors believe it's possible the non-feminist men lied about EDM use, but not possible that feminist men lied about erection difficulties. and as we all know, self-identified feminist men have a track record of pure honesty, right?

>>16184294
>Some antipsychotics have a long list of serious side effects. Some have only a few that rarely occur.
To my knowledge there is no antispychotic medication without the possibility of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), which are themselves a whole class of serious side effects unto themselves. Research suggests that the risk of EPS is 5.5% for typicals vs. 4% for atypicals (barely an improvement), but I suspect EPS are themselves significantly undercounted in general because an extrapyramidal symptom like "akathisia" will get reported as mere "restlessness" or "agitation" in the drug trials because the normies they're testing on don't have a sufficiently discerning medical vocabulary to accurately convey their perceived side-effects to the drug trial clinicians. Akathisia does involve agitation and restlessness, but akathisia as a whole is more than just those on their own. If the testing patient experiences akathisia but is not already familiar with this vocabulary term, they will typically convey the agitation and restlessness without knowing the actual term they should be using. In this manner, I am convinced most antipsychotics run a much higher risk (probably closer to 10-15%) of EPS than actually gets reported.

For instance, I get agitated when I haven't eaten in a long time. But that's a far cry from the VISCERAL need to literally *crawl out of my skin* as with bouts of akathisia I've experienced a handful of times previously (though not triggered by antipsychotics).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akathisia

And I'm not that other anon kek

>>16184294
>Some antipsychotics have a long list of serious side effects. Some have only a few that rarely occur.
To my knowledge there is no antispychotic medication without the possibility of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), which are themselves a whole class of serious side effects unto themselves. Research suggests that the risk of EPS is 5.5% for typicals vs. 4% for atypicals (barely an improvement), but I suspect EPS are themselves significantly undercounted in general because an extrapyramidal symptom like "akathisia" will get reported as mere "restlessness" or "agitation" in the drug trials because the normies they're testing on don't have a sufficiently discerning medical vocabulary to accurately convey their perceived side-effects to the drug trial clinicians. Akathisia does involve agitation and restlessness, but akathisia as a whole is more than just those on their own. If the testing patient experiences akathisia but is not already familiar with this vocabulary term, they will typically convey the agitation and restlessness without knowing the actual term they should be using. In this manner, I am convinced most antipsychotics run a much higher risk (probably closer to 10%) of EPS incidence.

For instance, I get agitated when I haven't eaten in a long time. But that's a far cry from the VISCERAL need to literally *crawl out of my skin* as with bouts of akathisia I've experienced a handful of times previously (though not triggered by antipsychotics).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akathisia

And I'm not that other anon kek

>>16184294
>Some antipsychotics have a long list of serious side effects. Some have only a few that rarely occur.
To my knowledge there exists no antispychotic without the possiblilty of extrapyramidal symptoms as side effects. Research shows that the risk of extrapyramidal side effects is 5.5% for typicals vs. 4% for atypicals, and I suspect EPS is undercounted in general because "akathisia" will get reported as mere "restlessness" in the drug trials because the normies they're testing on don't know how to distinguish the two.

And I'm not that other anon kek

>>16183991
>If it's 1 out of 10 homo men, then it's 1 out of 1000 people.

"Australia’s epidemic has been characterised by transmission among men who have sex with men. Sexual transmission between men accounted for 68% of newly diagnosed HIV infection in Australia between 2013 and 2017, increasing to 82% of newly acquired infection.[63] The Gay Community Period Surveys found a self-reported HIV prevalence of 8% among men attached to the gay community.[63] Data from sentinel surveillance sites reported HIV incidence of 0.85 per 100 person-years in 2016."
https://hivmanagement.ashm.org.au/the-epidemiology-of-hiv-in-australia/key-populations-in-the-australian-hiv-epidemic/

"MSM are disproportionately at risk for HIV infection. In the United States, the estimated lifetime risk for HIV infection among MSM is one in six, compared with heterosexual men at one in 524 and heterosexual women at one in 253 (191)."
https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/msm.htm

It isn't like these people don't know what HIV is or how to avoid it. This isn't the 1970's.
Without a doubt the majority got it because they want it.

>>16183697
pretty sure others have reported him about his sec ops already. if you give me the easiest way to contact them about this i will, but you can probably just send an email to them about this yourself as a european. see picrel and website linked. https://www.nasa.gov/cybersecurity-policies/

>>16183216
You got filtered by "mathematical maturity", didn't you? It's ok, many such cases.
>There are no difficult proofs in this course, students are only advised to have a certain level of mathematical maturity, with the implicit assumption being a working knowledge of Calculus 1-3, Linear Algebra, Algebra , Set Theory, Probability theory, Ordinary and Partial differential equations, some contact with real and complex Analysis including exposure to concepts from Topology, Symplectic geometry, Fourier analysis etc; all of which the reader will find as part of a normal elementary education. Prior exposure to electromagnetism is helpful, but not required. Many students have also reported that prior experience interning at CERN to be beneficial, but this is also optional.

>>16182935
>reported
Lol!

>another joe rogan thread
saged and reported

>>16182218
Reported video for misinformation. I seriously hope you don't take this thing seriously.

Why do male feminists have a higher rate of erectile dysfunction?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35104193/

>Men's Feminist Identification and Reported Use of Prescription Erectile Dysfunction Medication

One time my professor underhandedly suggested we just download the reference textbook online for free, and some goody two shoes nerd reported him to the dean and he got disciplined.

Why are nerds so evil?

>>16179161
reported for announcing a report

>>16173093
This is a shit tier scientific study, reported by an even shittier pop journalist. I could go through it, but I think I'll just go eat my steak dinner instead with some cheese after.

>NEW MEDICAL STUDY FINDS MARVELOUS CONCLUSION
Ig-to-the-nored! Most medical research put out there—especially what gets reported by the media—is garbage that will be rightfully dismissed as garbage in a few years, sometimes even months.

The participants were divided into groups of four and looked for the mystical animal through the grass for around half an hour, using poles and insect nets. A 52-year-old man from Nagano who joined the event for the first time with his family told the Mainichi Shimbun, "While we couldn't find any, maybe tsuchinoko should stay legendary."

Tsuchinoko sightings have been reported in the village from the early Showa period (1926-1989). The tsuchinoko legend pamphlet that the village created includes testimonies such as, "I thought it was an issho-bin sake bottle (which holds 1.8 liters of liquid)," "It was silver and shining," and, "It sounded like a tire when I threw a stone at it."

>>16173141
https://twitter.com/JAtanackov/status/1789828059098440058
>Aurora: update - a northward turn of Bz has reduced geomagnetic activity. No major aurora has been reported, with some very faint purple glow recorded by a high-altitude webcam in the Alps at 48°N. Further minor variations in activity may happen tonight, but no big show for now.

Russia has found vast oil and gas reserves in the Antarctic, much of it in areas claimed by the UK.

Reserves totalling 511bn barrels of oil – about 10 times the North Sea’s entire 50-year output – have been reported to Moscow by Russian research ships, according to evidence given to the Commons Environment Audit Committee (EAC) last week.

It follows a series of surveys by the Alexander Karpinsky vessel, operated by Rosgeo – the Russian agency charged with finding mineral reserves for commercial exploitation.

https://archive.is/Cx8iN

>>16167015

>Tracking that will give us critical information because what I love that you had Sean on, and he made the point. A lot of his symptoms are similar to long COVID symptoms. Well, that makes total sense. That happens often, with immunizations that if the natural disease can cause it, then it also can sometimes be seen in certain profiles of the vaccine. We should be studying that right now.

>Tell the people with long COVID and vaccine reactions to come forward. Study their genetics. We're in the 21st century. We know how to solve these issues, but we're not really bringing all the pieces we have to bear.

But is the reason because they don't wanna know that they being the deep state, big pharma, the government, whatever boogeyman you wanna fill in, because the truth is the vaccines didn't really work and there are way more side effects and more people got sick than got better as a result of it.

>Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. Do I think it's 1,000,000? No. Could it be 1,000? Yes.

>But there's millions of people with long COVID. So proportionally, when you look at it in a honest data driven way, more people have long COVID from having COVID than had vaccine reactions. That doesn't mean we shouldn't study it. Remember you and I both remember what happened during HIV. HIV had a lot of misinformation, a lot of confusion, and it's like we didn't learn from that.

>And what happened? Advocates and activists went to the streets and demanded that the government do better and the government did. So let's demand that the government do better and bring all of this transparently to light. Do you think that there is a legitimate basis to say if you could do it over again, people shouldn't have had the vaccine? There are definitive cohorts that should have and should have gotten the vaccine from the very moment and should have been prioritized.


2/3

>>16164609
It's a simulation. There, just as much "science" as your made up reason. Yes I can craft an experiment to prove or disprove simulation theory. I bet I could do it faster and for less money than people like you spent to get no where on Dark Matter and Dark Energy.

Other scientists have theories like modified newtonion dynamics and even errors in the fundamental understanding or observations of the universe. It's very possible you could all be chasing literally nothingburgers.

You might as well call it "Mystery X" and see how you avoid all the other possibilities including that it could all be a base level mistake in the math or model. Instead you spin tales of magic ether and magic dust that is unseeable ....unseeable unless you build giant expensive atom smashers where you and all your scientist buddies get cushy jobs to play science all day. It's so laughable. All you tards do is fail and then scream at anyone who dares point out the obvious. PROVE ME WRONG I'LL WAIT HERE!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics

>>16164664
Oh I have anon, medical doctors do the same bullshit. They have a "Mystery Illness X" and give it some fancy name. But when you look into what the name means it means "Mysterious (symptom Y) Disorder" Then they diagnose you with MYD and you think that means they know what's wrong with you....but they literally don't know shit, just that you have the symptom you self reported. It's basically a fancy way of saying you've "got the vapers" or some other bullshit 18th century quack speak. Same here with physics, they are calling it "ether" and other nonsense terms that mean nothing.

>>16162972
>I think lack of diversity in the microbiome serving as an immunomodulatory effect
Microbiome is a buzzword. Either way, it would still stand to reason that metabolical changes affecting neurons and what not would have to be measurable. Given that we know that psychotropic drugs hardly ever have the same effects on any two different people, I fear that such a project which is much more general in its task of measuring metabolical rate is going to be difficult at the very least.
>the concept of "autism" should be done with
Yes, but the definition always was socially constructed garbage to begin with.
>and notion that children can develop it a few years into their life betrays that
The problem here is that we're arguing with semantics. Doctors might diagnose brain damage cases or encephalitis or meningitis or a viral infection as autism. Does that make them "autistic"? No..
Then, much of traditional autism research rests on institutionalized cases that were pumped full with antipsychotics and other drugs known to be neurotoxic. In fact, to take an example: In the "autistic" cohort, subjects, if they develop epileptic fits, they will do so either during early childhood or adolescence (per literature). The peak around early childhood coincides with the onset of symptoms more generally (anecdotally, seizures are often reported as having preceded regression in a child) whereas the peak around adolescence might be due to institutions starting to put such clients on antipsychotics and neuroleptics (both known to cause seizures). A bimodal probability distribution usually implies that we deal with two different mechanisms.
>But even aspies can suffer from some of the physical symptoms of autism such as poor coordination, gut dysbiosis, occasionally epilepsy.
So can anyone. We would have to account for a lot of other variables. Either way, it's clear that the current conception of autism pathologizes social deviation while ignoring fundamental difficulties.

Let's say you want to lift up a 600 ton boulder with just your body alone and no external assistance or built in machines installed inside you, what if it was possible to this but we haven't figured it out? What if the only way to lift up a 600 ton boulder is by lifting it in a very certain way like a video game controller combo where you have to follow multiple steps in order to manipulate every atom of the boulder to your liking? What if levitation was possible by doing the same thing?

What if the reason why some things are labeled "impossible" is because our current knowledge doesn't understand how to solve the problem? Even some UFOs seen flying have reported to appear breaking the laws of physics.